[ad_1]
Luigi Di Maio's father would have forced the workers to work in black. This is not true To be specific, it is the mother of Di Maio who did it. This would be all the more serious since the woman, who is the director of a Neapolitan public school and who thus embodies the role of a public official, would not only have violated the law by working with blacks, but would also have omitted one of the basic rules of the official, that is to say exclusiveness. For, apart from a special derogation, "employees of the public administration can not exercise any profession or employ individuals or accept positions in companies established for profit", provides for Article 58 of Legislative Decree n. 29 of 1993.
But let's get back to order and reconstruct the complex story of Di Maio Industry. It all started with a survey of hyenas, which interviewed a man, Salvatore Pizzo, who said that he had worked in black for the construction business of the minister's fatherwho is called Ardima.
The father of the current Minister of Labor and Economic Development, Luigi Di Maio, is Antonio Di Maio, born in 1950, born and raised in Pomigliano d'Arco, who owns no business. This is true. From the chamber of commerce made by the Espresso, it turns out that Di Maio's father does not have any stock or shares of companies. In the past, he was the owner of Di Maio Antonio, a single-family company in Pomigliano specializing in roof construction, which was canceled in 1995. Since 1997, he has been a deputy auditor of the Regional Consortium for Craftsmanship. residential buildings, finished in liquidation. He also has a pending account at Equitalia, which he should pay at 176 thousand euros. Paolina Esposito owns the family business and some land in Pomigliano d'Arco. Or the mother of Luigi Di Maio, In 2006, he founded the independent company Ardima Costruzioni, who became the signatory owner, so that, in the room, he was qualified as a small entrepreneur and on December 30, 2013, he gave the property to his sons Luigi and Rosalba. The Ardima construction, which has only two employees, deals with the demolition of buildings and the layout of the land, the laying of the roof and the construction of the roof, the painting, the glazing and, in general, construction work. . As it is not a capital company, Ardima is under no obligation to file financial statements; we do not know if she is healthy or not.
In parallel, the Di Maio family created in March 2012 a second company, Ardima Srl, owned equally by the minister and her sister Rosalba (50% each). The company not only has the same name, but has virtually the same social purpose, that is, it deals with the same activities as the Ardima buildings on behalf of Mother Esposito. In June 2014, Ardima Srl, the Deputy Prime Minister's and his sister's, acquired the parent company, which transferred a total amount of 80,200 euros to the children, bringing the total value of the new capital of Ardima to 100. 200 euros.
Initially, Rosalba is CEO of the new company, but in 2017, he takes over Giuseppe, his younger brother (clbad 1994). However, this role of sole director of the family business does not seem particularly lucrative: Luigi Di Maio himself, in the transparent administration section, declares that his brother Giuseppe Di Maio did not receive any income in 2017 and adds that "to my honor, I declare that the declaration corresponds to the truth". Maybe 2017 was a complex year, since to date, the company has not yet tabled its 2017 budget. And previous years? In 2016, the company said just over ten thousand euros in profits, for a business turnover of just over 200 thousand euros. Among other things, it is clear from the documentation before the House that, in 2013, the then MP, Di Maio, did not declare in the special heritage declaration his 50% interest in Ardima . Lacuna filled the following year.
But let's go back to Di Maio's mother. Paolina Esposito is a school principal, head of the Istituto Comprensivo Giovanni Bosco of Volla, province of Naples, and since 1980, teacher in the first and second level schools of the district. In particular, from 2001 to 2015, she was titular professor at Liceo Imbriani of Pomigliano of Arco and, at the same time, he owned the family business. Yet Italian law does not allow it. Article 60 of the Decree of the President of the Republic of March 1957 and Article 53 of the Consolidated Law on Public Employment (Legislative Decree 29 of 1993) stipulate that civil servants may not business or to work for private employers. , hold positions in for-profit corporations, engage in commercial or industrial activities and hold unpaid positions not badigned by the administration to which they belong.
Public sector employees can become entrepreneurs only if they get special permission from the home administration. But these are rare cases and it is very difficult for Paolina Esposito to obtain it. In fact, for full-time public workers – like Esposito – it is presumed that they do not have the time needed to perform a double job without compromising the efficiency of public employment: one speaks then absolute incompatibility.
We summarize: Paolina Esposito, teacher, was the owner of Ardima during the period during which illegal work was reported. If this had been confirmed, it would have violated the legal provisions in tax and social security, by subtracting taxes and contributions to the Treasury, INPS and INAIL in favor of its badets, which were then given to sons Luigi and Rosalba . . Thus, Luigi di Maio and his sister would be the real beneficiaries of the dirty work done by the former parent company which, technically, could not occupy this position. Indeed, the teacher and the mother of the minister would have broken the rules of incompatibility deriving from his role as public official.
Source link
