Beer withdrawn from the market. Reason, many, brand and where. And a bewildering research on beers



[ad_1]

The dilemma is always the same. Drink beer or drink wine? In this period when the Nerone anticyclone makes its particularly warm presence in Italy, the choice seems to be timely. To be eaten fresh, even frozen, able to bring that refreshment for many is a mirage of those times. But even in this case, unfortunately, the pleasure of enjoying a good cold beer could be marred by the presence of glyphosate and contamination by pesticides. French research reveals that it warns against the excessive consumption of beers that could be really dangerous to human health. It is precisely for this reason that the investigation of the search for potentially toxic substances for the human body will continue until all doubts have been dispelled.

Brands and health hazards

Bees badyzed in the laboratory of well two hundred and fifty substances potentially dangerous to human health, the National Institute of Consumption in France belong to forty-five types different. Many famous brands not only for blonde aficionados. And the health risks can not be excluded, unfortunately. Also because the results of the badyzes showed that glyphosate, already declared probable carcinogen by IARC, was detected in twenty-five brands, confirming itself as the most used pesticide in agriculture.

And while it is true that all substances The risks that have been observed, especially pesticides and pesticides, have never crossed the planned roof, we must not forget that the limits vary from one country to another. Not to mention the effect of accumulation in our body whose consequences could be just as dangerous. There are many brands: from Corona to Carlsberg, Leffe to Stella Artois.

And there is also the withdrawal for too much alcohol

But beers are the focus of media attention in these days also due to other rather curious events. There was also a beer removed from the market for the excess alcohol that it contained. The Glutenberg brewery, which voluntarily recalled some of its beers because of a higher alcohol content than that indicated on the package, imposed a public fine. The lot concerned is the one in which the boxes bear lot code 24606298 with the expiry date of March 29, 2019. This is reported by the company, reports the badociation's Consumer Rights Window & # 39; ;.

In fact, the alcohol level indicated on the package was 0.1%. However, the beers in the lot in question had an alcohol content of 3.4%: the product placed on the market was then recalled and recovered to almost one hundred percent, with retailers contacted to remove the product from the shelves. Corrective measures have already been put in place to further validate the alcohol content of this product and prevent this from happening again.

[ad_2]
Source link