[ad_1]
Behind the exit of President Tesauro, the moral issue for the interception on Lanzalone between Fiorentino and the arrested builder Parnasi
by MARCO PREVE [19659004] The official statement of Banca Carige has the effect of a cork on a volcano erupting. He acknowledges the resignation – the nth – of a director, in this case Francesca Balzani, motivating them with "differences over the governance of the bank."
What the page says not, it is that towards the CEO of the bank, Paolo Fiorentino, there are those who have raised serious moral ethical issues as well as what is defined in the environment of the "financial democracy".
The farewell of Francesca Balzani, one of the best-known tax lawyers in Italy, already deputy then badessor in Genoa and at the Sala Sala in Milan, he arrives after ten very hot days to the Ligurian bank. On June 25, President Giuseppe Tesauro, former president of the Constitutional Court, resigned. If officially his motivations were technical ("I do not understand more the relational modes of the ECB, which lately write and dialogue directly with the CEO and only marginally with the president", one read in one missive steps of resignation) actually the fall that had overwhelmed the ship was an interception of the Roman investigation involving the builder Luca Parnasi and the lawyer, director of the M5, Luca Lanzalone, both arrested for corruption .
Tesauro, with his past as a judge at the highest level, could not tolerate the tone of the dialogue between Fiorentino and Parnasi. "You also have to do something to Lanzalone, from 50 … 30,000 euros of advice … make him bullshit! Let's build this relationship round! So when it's time …". That's what the manufacturer Luca Parnasi says to the general manager of Banca Carige, Paolo Fiorentino. The dialogue appears in an interception present in the last information of the carabinieri. A dialogue, write the investigators, which is quoted "to highlight what is the purpose for which Parnasi promises to entrust or entrust Lanzalone with the tasks" and that shows that "Parnasi promises to ensure that these tasks acquire the benevolence of President Acea and consultant of the Municipality of Rome. "
It seems that to disturb Tesauro was this "too" pronounced by Parnasi. The former president of the Constitutional Court did not tolerate the frequent relations between Fiorentino and Gianpiero Fiorani who, after the season, and the conviction, for bankruptcy, became the operative arm of Gabriele Volpi, Carige's second shareholder,
A few days after the resignation of Tesauro again goodbye by Stefano Lunardi. In this case, the usual "differences in governance" concerned heavy criticisms made by Lunardi in Fiorentino about the sale of Carige's "jewels" to keep the institute afloat. Similar reasons would have forced Francesca Balzani to resign. The lawyer, who was also a member of the Risk Committee, was recently the protagonist of a tough clash with Fiorentino over the decision to sell Carige shares of Autostrada dei Fiori to the Gavio group, which holds already the majority. The confrontation would be ignited not only on the choice to deprive oneself of a valuable badet, but also on the procedure followed. In other words, Fiorentino did not introduce or wanted to discuss a proposal, but would have decided and then imposed on the board its choice.
It is true that you need eight resignations to bring down the card, the output is also from a president with the program of Tesauro and the farewell of other names "heavy" like that of Lunardi and Balzani will force the Malacalza family to make decisions. One could be to give the floor to the members. Until today, the Malacalza, despite relations with Fiorentino are not idyllic, seem to be prisoners of their past choices, or dismissals of previous directors. Another torch could create a reaction on the market that is difficult to contain
