[ad_1]
Motivations ok appeal pm against Salvini, now it is to the Review
Share
"Anywhere" all the money pertaining to the Northern League is found – on bank accounts, booklets, deposits – must be seized up to 49 million euros, the proceeds of fraud in the state for which the former leader of the Umberto Bossi League has been condemned at first instance
The Cbadation emphasizes this in the reasons that welcome the appeal of the Genoa prosecutor against Matteo Salvini contrary to the carpet seizures. The review should now follow the indications of "ermellini". 1.5 million euros locked up so far.
In the opinion of the highest magistrates, the Guardia di Finanza can proceed to the blocking of Lega accounts under the seizure decree issued on September 4 by the Genoa public prosecutor, without the need for a new provision for any sums discovered on the accounts. to the decree.
On the contrary, according to Giovanni Ponti, Lega's lawyer, the only sums that can be seized are those appearing on the accounts "at the time of the execution of the seizure" with "consequential inadmissibility of the requests of the prosecutor to seize the sums deposited ". According to the defense of the League, the prosecutor could only request the confiscation of "future sums" during the appeal process.
But the Supreme Court objected that the money on the accounts may not have been found at the time of the decree "for a transitional or reversible impossibility", and the prosecutor does not have to account for all the investigations carried out "otherwise the precautionary function be easily avoided during the time it takes to complete them."
Court of Cbadation: seizure of accounts has legal obligations
Order of seizure of accounts Lega, published on September 4 by the prosecutor of Genoa following the conviction of Umberto Bossi and other defendants for fraud against the state for about 49 million euros, is therefore a provision that "has was issued in accordance with the requirements of the law and which was not the subject of an appeal from the North Lega. "
The Supreme Court emphasizes that in the verdict that opens carpet "accounts of the League also for sums recovered after the issuance of the decree and which is in the pursuit of the investigation hunt the" treasure "illegally confiscated by the Carroccio – according to the indictment – between 2008 and 2010, and without the need for a new decree
In essence, the "stoats" report that the League, after the conviction of Bossi, has not disputed the legitimacy of the seizure of sums illegally confiscated by the former head, but only later The rite now headed by Matteo Salvini tried to "curb" the seizure of sums that could be
For this story, Bossi, re-elected to the Senate, was sentenced to two years and six months in first instance., former treasurer of the Francesco League Belsito at four years and ten months, a year and nine months Stefano Aldovisi, two years and eight months each Diego Sanavio and Antonio Turci. The last three were sentenced as auditors of the League. At trial, the highest sentence was that of five years' imprisonment for the money inflicted on Paolo Scala and Stefano Bonet, contractors suspected of having transferred part of the loot, to Cyprus and Tanzania. .
Execution by the PM to extend the original protective measure, which aimed at the direct confiscation of the sum of 48 million 696,617 euros, also to the sums paid in a moment after the date of execution of the decree of seizure of September 4, 2017 on the accounts and deposits related to the Lega Nord, do not involve novation "or do not require a new seizure.This is because the verdict 29923 continues," the object of the precautionary measure is always that of the original decree, which has not been challenged, among other things, and it is the existence of the monetary availability of the League of North who has grown from the profit of the crime, thus legitimizing the direct confiscation of the relative amount, everywhere and with any person detained and thus also from the one received on the accounts and / or deposits on the date following the execution of the genetic disposition "
[ad_2]
Source link
