[ad_1]
SISMA – Except for Imu and Tasi, damaged, unusable or already demolished houses contribute to the calculation of income. A huge mockery for families who lost their homes during the earthquake of 2016. At the risk of gaining citizenship
Castelsantangelo sul Nera
of Federica Nardi
Do you have a house demolished after the earthquake? It will end however in Isee. And you may have too much income to access the facilities. Including, in the future, the citizenship income. New mockery for earthquake victims who lost their homes. But not for the calculation of income. With the exception of the Imu and Tasi (who are not remunerated on the basis of the inagibilità union order), the other facilities contribute to the determination of the income of the total cadastral value of the unusable house, even if they do not are only rubble.
In short, a low-income family (less than 20,000 euros per year) and property owned – unsuitable and thus not generating income – with an average cadastre income of 800 or 1,000 euros, will have an ISEE greater than 35,000 euros. This means that no tuition facilitation outside the region will be facilitated (the Marche universities have instead made available to students affected by earthquakes), no benefit for access municipal services, a health care exemption, school books, home health services, family or baby bonuses, discounts on Rai fees, and so on. In addition, victims of the earthquake who have changed residence may be weighed even more than the unfit house, which would appear as a second home. More than 100,000 buildings were damaged and more than 35,000 people were evacuated, most of which became unusable in the four regions affected by the 2016 earthquake (Marche, Umbria, Abruzzo and Lazio). The problem also concerns the victims of the earthquake of Ischia. After the Corriere della Sera's anticipation on this subject, the coordination of the "Central Italy: earthquakes" committees issued a warning: "The victims of the earthquake even outside the Isee, but how many would you pull on this rope? "
The problem has never been examined (for example, the Genoa Decree, which also contained rules relating to the earthquake in central Italy and that of Ischia). At the moment, the quickest regulatory route could be an amendment to the tax decree or the finance law. Or bring the matter back to a civil protection order with a subsequent circular from the director of the revenue agency for enforcement. Another hypothesis: insert in the forms of the Isee, under the heading buildings, a field to report the calamity that struck the house and the order of the union inagibilità. To not calculate for real estate purposes destroyed or unusable as damaged.
[ad_2]
Source link
