[ad_1]
Thirty years of imprisonment. The Assize Court of Catania upholds the first instance sentence of October 17, 2016, pronounced by Gup de Ragusa Andrea Reale, against Veronica Panarello the woman accused of killing the November 29, 2014, the 8-year-old son Loris. He allegedly strangled him in his house in Santa Croce Camerina, in the Ragusa area, with plastic strips, then threw his little body into a ravine in the Mulino Vecchio neighborhood
A phrase that the woman, dressed in black, lightened long hair, does not agree to react violently previously against a journalist, who sent "to this country", then against her stepfather, Andrea Stival, whom she considers as the cause of all his ills: he accused him of killing Loris for not revealing it to the father of their alleged relationship, but was not believed by more judges. In the clbadroom, standing, he clearly shows it with one finger and shouts, "Are you happy and everything is your fault, but I kill you with my hands when I go out …". The woman has left the prison police. But he considers the "unfair punishment" and tells his lawyer, the lawyer Francesco Villardita, who reports the bestowal of the accused before being transferred to prison: "" From now, there will be no more discounts for anyone: since I have not had justice, justice will do it alone and when I leave prison I will kill him. " , for the criminal lawyer, "in a moment of desperation, there may be even if – says the lawyer Villardita – can not be justified, we must understand his state of mind." Andrea Stival, a civil party at trial, responds between anger and indignation: "The disgust that Veronica Panarello did." There is nothing I can say about her that took life of a child and people around her.There will never be justice for my nephew, because he will never come back. "
Her husband David Stival, who went back to his father, so that they were seated side by side in the audience hall, defines the reaction as "the umpteenth show that Veronica is doing in front of the journalists and the cameras". "The confirmation of his condemnation – he adds bitterly – will not make me my son, but Loris must have a minimum of justice, he always stays in my heart". No comments from Fr. Maria Aschettino and Rev. Marco Rota, who represented the prosecution in the courtroom. They are the ones who returned to accuse Panarello, asking and obtaining the confirmation of the sentence of first instance. It remains for her, who claims to be innocent, the heavy accusation of being a "lucid murderer and beggar". Also in the appeal we talked about "lies" of Veronica Panarello, one of the pillars of the accusation that the defense has failed, for the moment, to scratch. The woman, that is the thesis of the Procuratorate, did it all by herself, accusing the stepfather, Andrea Stival, alien to the facts for the judges, of a "devastating appeal" to the past family and to "provide an unsuspected and very serious motive. ", but false.
At the center of the investigation are reenactments of the prosecutor's office, based on investigations by state police, mobile brigade and carabineers, shared by the GIP of Ragusa, the Court of Catania and the Cbadation, and now also of the Court of Assizes of Catania, there remains a murder without motive, irrelevant in the condemnation, but full of "lies." Those of Veronica who lie when he says he accompanied his son to school, when he says that it was a domestic accident with the child who would play himself, and when he accuses his father-in-law of killing him because Loris had threatened to reveal to her father a supposed badual relationship between the two .For his lawyer, the lawyer Francesco Villardita, are not lies "but a path to the truth, thanks to the memories that he had over time and in some cases he was afraid to reveal. "For the experts, the woman has" a personality in conflict with herself and her family, immature from a parental point of view, lying and strongly histrionic, egocentric and manipulative ". Meanwhile, his lawyer expects the filing of motives: "It will be interesting to read them – explains Villardita – and especially to see why they have not granted the general mitigating circumstances, a half-infirmity spell, n & # 39; 39 not having to repeat psychiatric expertise and comparison with stepfather We will evaluate the appeal in cbadation. "
[ad_2]
Source link
