[ad_1]
French President Emmanuel Macron naturally tends to make a great show but when he imposes (as he did at the last European summit) that economic immigrants have entered France by the way by Italy should be welcomed by Italy, who will then think about doing what seems to him to be unfortunately on the side of the right and therefore also the reason, writes Pierluigi Magnaschi on Italia Oggi. Macron can indeed request this obligatory fulfillment because that is what the Dublin agreement requires which was freely signed, and without a word, in his initial draft and then in subsequent amendments, even by five Italian governments that it is good to remember by name, to understand who has been who has stuck Italy in the insoluble angle of uncontrollable immigration.
The Italian governments that approved the Leonin Pact of Dublin were: Berlusconi, Monti, Letta, Renzi and Gentiloni. These five governments, although of different political orientation, expressed a common resignation to the demands expressed especially by France and quickly swallowed by the Italian governments as if they were pills. The Italian governments, adopting this resigned and defeatist attitude, did not even have the excuse that, on the point that they approved (and which we will describe shortly in detail), they had been defeated because on their thesis they had not managed to find a sufficient majority of other European countries
This excuse (which in any case would have been a justification, even painful for Italy) does not not resist because such community agreements, to be able to pbad, must be approved with all favorable votes. So just one country applies (we are talking about veto here) because the measure, although it can count on the approval of all other countries, does not pbad. Of course, to oppose the right of veto requires firmness, courage and a spirit of defense of national interests. We need the opposite of resignation, which is the attitude that Italy has always expressed at the European level. To give an idea of how France defends its national interest, it is sufficient to recall that it has not hesitated to reject even the draft European Constitution which would have formed the basis of the construction of the United States. United of Europe that Macron, today, He says that he wants to do it.
Now, what are the Dublin Agreements approved by the center-left Italian governments (more left than center, to be honest) and that the governments that approved it in the subsequent corrections, I will repeats) now accuse the Conté government of the League of not being able to dismantle, at the European summit last weekend which, among other things, did not foresee, on its agenda, any hypothesis review of the agreements from Dublin? In short, there is no limit to the collective responsibility of all the governments of the recent past who, with these collective results, accuse the current government of mistakes dating back to the time when this government not only did not work but was far from seeing the light.
The Dublin agreements provide that they are responsible for the non-defense of their borders, the countries through which migrants have illegally entered the Schengen area where the free movement of people and goods is expected, to the point that, between these countries, the customs barriers were demolished and in particular the abolition of controls of property and persons along the area that formerly belonged to former borders and which were declared dissolved, is specifically visually, as well as legally. The first-tier countries have the obligation (the Dublin agreement always says that, again, it has not been approved by legapentastellati), they have the obligation, I l & rsquo; I said, identify immigrants by taking their fingerprints that must be immediately communicated These last countries, when they identify their home, are illegal immigrants who have entered the EU, say, across Italy (and this badessment is easy, unambiguous and instantaneous, since this can be done automatically thanks, in fact, to fingerprints), this immigrant, I've said, can be returned immediately and automatically to the country of penetration in Europe (here again Italy) without having to pbad, for the approval of the refoulement, by the judicial authorities of the country which rejects them in Italy, but which on the contrary takes steps to defend the illegal immigrant re, when Italian police attempt at its v olta, to refer the & # 39; immigrated to the country & # 39; origin as often (and artfully) you do not even know what c & # 39; is.
The fact is that the previous Italian center-left governments, unfortunately to approve the agreement in Dublin, they did not take into account (and have not pleaded) the fact that, in practice, only two Schengen countries are separated from the North African countries by a maritime area which, by definition, is easily neutralized even by the excuse (sometimes it is also a reality) that all other countries , or are too far from these shores (like France and, in part, Spain) or have land borders which, as demonstrated with the closure of the Balkan Way, they are easily equipped, or with hotspots (concentration camps) armored and paid in Turkey or with the construction of real barriers such as those built on the border with Hungary or with tanks threatened by Austria.
equally impervious, maritime boundaries such as land borders are much more complex and risky. This was demonstrated, for example, by the unintentional bombardment of the Cbade of Otranto on March 28, 1997, during the Prodi government's reign, by the Italian Navy's Sibilla, which sank the patrol boat. Albanian with 120 refugees on board. On this occasion, 58 people died. This is why patrols of military ships should be conducted with European units and a continental command to share the burdens and risks for the entire continent that is globally hit by this flood of people who are in the hands of the worst traffickers d & # 39; men.
which has now required the government attached to the leg. This at least has the merit of placing at the heart of the European debate the problem of illegal immigration from Africa that the five more or less center-left governments had carefully hidden and downplayed by approving rules that now oblige Italy to absorb not only "immigration from the South (which comes from Africa, which we are already experiencing) but also from the North (with the return of those who, having disembarked in Italy, have spread all over the European continent). In short, we are in a grip of immigration on the previous five governments more or less center-left and legapentastella action now seeks to defuse. But it will not be easy. It was not called pacta sunt servanda, that is, if the pacts were observed?
Source link
