[ad_1]
The latest invention of Grillo? This is certainly not so new, nor so outrageous. The idea of a political investiture by lot goes back several centuries. Even today, he enjoys some popularity among the theoreticians of democracy. And democratic experiences that use random selection already exist in the world and are of great interest. Some see the draw as a corrective alternative to the principle of representation by election.
The latest invention of Grillo? Remember the ancient invention of Grillo and Casaleggio: or rather, the reinvention, through the network, of direct democracy, which already in ancient Athens was combined with the mechanism of the draw. Forced to come to terms with representative democracy, the Movement born on the axis Genoa-Milan proposes to bring a "champion" of citizens to Parliament. A micro-cosmos, recalls Grillo, which makes representation coincide with representativeness: "An engineer. A student A lawyer. A drug dealer to keep us a little "moral". The latest invention of Grillo? In a sense center, it already exists, and it's called M5s: a political subject that goes beyond parties, and professional politicians prefer normal people, without competence (political), which at the end of the second term will be replaced by other normal people. The selection on Rousseau is done – yes – by election, but with so few that it seems random. Grillo's latest invention was read for these reasons as an attack on the new political clbad of 5 and his leadership. Because this training has grown, even in its internal organization: it has been given hierarchies, even a leader. Moreover, each statistical sample is truly representative only when it is extracted. And any organization produces an oligarchy.
So here is the latest invention of Grillo: put the citizens "in the urn", turning the Senate of the Republic into a House of draws. The "problem" of the government remains. In the new world order prophesied by Casaleggio, in 2054 the people of the network, in addition to deciding directly, would have elected their own (world) government. But in the democratic democracy of drawing, the prime minister could also be randomly drawn from Parliament.
Already Isaac Asimov, in the 50s, imagined an electronic democracy in which the super-pc Multivac selected a single representative person
from the entire electorate: the elector of year, whose answers were used to determine the result of the "vote". So why not extract the first of the year directly from the population: the Champion of the Republic? –
BY CERTAIN RIGHTS RESERVED
Source link
