[ad_1]
Fans of the grill mantra for which "we are worth one" are warned: reading the theory in this article could cause fainting and hives. Yet, it was precisely this, probably, the intention of the economist Dambisa Moyo in proposing the granting of the right to vote on the basis of the degree of education : provoke. To provoke a reaction, a reflection: however, provoke
Asked by Vanity Fair Moyo asks a question resolutely "uncomfortable": "Because my vote is as valid as that of a person who does not it inform? ". A direct attack on universal suffrage neither more nor less
An attack based on the badumption that to help define the face of the elective institutions you must know how it works.
The name of the new system would be "weighted vote": "The idea is that voters are called to show their commitment to politics and elections, if they turn out informed then their vote is fully valid, instead of proving that they are not, they will be slightly lower. "
The degree of information would be measured with the help of a test modeled on the model already in place to grant citizenship to foreigners, nothing to do with the qualifications obtained or with the wealth of the family of origin: everything, indeed, should undergo this preparatory examination to vote.
The essential premise of all this reasoning is the confidence in the desire of citizens to participate in the elective process. The Moyo badumes that, wanting to express themselves, the most ignorant citizens will be encouraged to learn. which, however, remains to be verified. 659 007]
[ad_2]
Source link
