[ad_1]
November 29, 2018 03:00
"I'm afraid this kind of advancement does cause a bigger retirement."
An executive from a life science company is worried. On Monday, there was talk of a Chinese study that marveled life science circles around the world. Professor Hajen Kuu of the Nanfang University of Science and Technology in China claimed that he had managed to produce a human twin baby that modified the gene using the world's first genetic correction technology. Disease can be prevented by eliminating the immune proteins badociated with AIDS infection. But the process was strange. This was a one-sided argument that was not subject to a verification process such as "peer review", which is an official reporting process by academia. Professor Huh went to an international conference in Hong Kong this week and is known as a journalist.
The argument within the scientific community, which gives priority to the cross-validation of universities, will gradually disappear and be filtered naturally. But this time it was different. Indeed, the subject has touched the thread, considered by the community of life sciences as an implicit taboo. It's the birth of 'designer baby'. (a personalized baby who modified the gene as you wish).
Humans already have the technology to artificially correct genes, and they are refining and polishing them more and more. This is a powerful gene-correction tool called "Crisper" that has revolutionized life sciences since its peak in 2012. By combining the ability of the virus to accurately detect a specific gene and the function of the gene. 39 Enzyme that breaks DNA, you can find and delete exactly the desired gene. It should contribute to the development of crops and livestock producing more food, treating incurable diseases and diagnosing diseases.
The problem is, like a fairy tale child in the hands of a magic broom, to use the power of this tool intensely. The most representative is the use of human embryos (embryos). Scientists of life should not have thought of this problem. In April 2015, a Chinese research team succeeded for the first time in calibrating human embryos in a laboratory using Crisper and publishing it in a newspaper. After the intense ethical debate, scientists decided in early December that: "It is irresponsible to correct germ cells unless there is a strong social consensus about the appropriateness of Crispap application." At present, some countries, such as the United States, allow the correction of human embryos only for basic research purposes, such as the treatment of genetic diseases.
It is appalling that the scientists' resolutions have not prevented the researcher from "letting go" once and for all. The researchers criticized the question of ethics as the second reason why Professor Huh's research does not make sense both in the medical sense and in the industrial sense. He is also concerned about the resurgence of research-based pharmaceutical products that will bring the life sciences to life.
This does not mean that it is technically possible to do anything. A fairy tale child with a magic broom was a teacher to save, but no other person can repair the results of the study in reality. Scientists have no choice but to keep the line.
November 29, 2018 03:00
Source link
