[서소문 포럼] Two of the film's hearing boarders' drug film & # 39;



[ad_1]

  Editorial Editor of Jang Se-jung

Editorial Editor of Jang Se-jung

The Purpose and Purpose of the Video Clbadification Council (Yeong-cheol)

However, criticism has been growing more prevalent than the movie 'Seokjeon & # 39; and & # 39; Witches & # 39; were judged as "15 years (2). The "poisoning", a remake of the Hong Kong war movie "Drug War" (2013) produced in 2013, exposes the scene where the characters breathe the drug powder into the nose, drugs and bads of wife. The public also filed a national petition for quotations at the Blue House, saying, "It is difficult to understand the ratings of 15 years old.

Comparing "Burning" (Lee Chang-dong) and "Seokjeon" (Lee Hae-young), which were judged to be jet lag only on April 23 and April 30, respectively, and "Seojeon" sucked explicitly Methamphetamine – based narcotics in the nose, but received a 15 – year listening rating. On the other hand, "Burning" received a judgment that the main character, male and female, shared cannabis and was not allowed to visit the youth (19 "gold & # 39; 39;).

Whether because of the box office wings, Lee Seung-gwang, who has exceeded 5 million people and penetrated deep into the audience through the IPTV. "Burning", popular at the Cannes Film Festival, was sluggish at around 520,000, while the threshold increased. Some members of the film industry claim that "the rating scale decreases because the government has more freedom of expression than the Park Geun-hye government, which has put the emphasis on protection of youth through a large number of government members.

In fact, the members of the film clbadification subcommittee (7 members, term 1 year) affiliated with the seniority committee unfortunately changed on April 30. On the first day of his tenure, the first day of his tenure, the Subcommittee on Accreditation ruled that "drug abuse" and "illicit drug abuse". I asked the young man how it was possible to make a difficult decision to understand.

[15]

The Director of the 15-Year-Old Spectator Clbadification

"The Producer Expected a 15-Year-Old Spectator Rating,"

[la jeunesse] can not go to youth Why did you raise the hand of the manufacturer when half of the opinions were taken?

"The majority of the vote was determined by a majority vote and the chairman of the subcommittee decided:" The chairman of the subcommittee decided. "

Who was the president?

"It is not possible to disclose who specifically commented on the impartiality and independence of the evaluation of the rating."

How many people can be accepted. I would like to ask to the so-called members of the clbad, "Would you recommend a drug movie to your 2 children?"

In fact, drug abuse is not just a movie issue, but a Serious social evil. "Choi Joo-won, the head of the police department, said," The number of juvenile drug traffickers is steadily increasing from 75 in 2013 to 113 last year. "Professor Kwon Dae- kyung of the Dongguk University Police Case Law stated: "Korea, a country that cleans the drug, has has lost control over 10,000 people every year since 2015, "says a curious teenager who can not handle drugs. "He said

I thought of an alternative that would complement the system of youth protection of pierced eels.First, let's put in place the principle of deliberation that prioritizes the protection of youth , which is an abbreviation in case of conflict between youth protection and freedom of expression Secondly, include at least one youth protection specialist eligible for the rating subcommittee. We make a judgment and establish a reconsideration procedure.If there is no such efforts and that the film industry earns more money than the protection of the youth, it will not. There is no reason for Lee to remain.

Jang Se-jung, editorial writer


[ad_2]
Source link