[취재일기] The national pension is not a pension of the scheme

"There are many old friends.

It's all about. A confession of Mr. Aoyong Lee who left the headquarters of the National Pension Fund.The five former executives interviewed by the journalists are "relocated" and "controversial staff." After the move of headquarters to Jeonju last February, the number has increased and the Director of the Fund Management Division (CIO) is vacant for the first year.The chief of staff and the team leader are vacant everywhere.It is difficult to find matching talents at the level of the eyes

The crisis of the management is the national crisis of the pensions The political circles demanded the national pension In June 2013, the modification of the law on the National Pension Fund, which stipulated that the seat of the fund's management was Jeonbuk, Kim Jae-won was the representative of the Shinnuri party, and Kim Seong-joo, a member of the Democratic Party (now the president of the pension society), pushed for that. I doubt that it be adopted by the National Assembly, but 209 members of the National Assembly approved it. He sent the fund's headquarters away from the financial market and needed to breathe. After that, when the previous history of Seoul was revealed, the political opposition continued in the "fund management headquarters of Jeonbuk Dokdo" (Kim Sung-joo) and "I will not be sitting "(Kim Kwang-soo).

The appointment of CIO is not exempt from the smell of Cheong Wa Dae. Each scheme has a close relationship with key personnel, or "orders" that do not relate to the pension industry. CIOs who are unable to meet their conditions for up to three years are the complainants. Kang, former managing director, resigned after a year and five months.

On the other hand, Ann Stosball, CEO of CalPERS, was responsible for seven years of operation starting in 2009. The Investment Board of Canada Pension Plans (CPPIB) ) also remained in place for four years and seven years for the full-time CEO. The Swedish public pension system (PA) is divided into six and operates independently, and the government only reports after the results. The current and old direction is very envious of America and Canada. They say, "CIOs need to be endowed with qualities and personality, no policy is needed" and "independence should be guaranteed for everything".

"I do not think it's worth the money (the premium)," said a citizen in a recent national retirement advertising. However, citizens in real life recall the image of "burnout" and "mistrust" when they receive a pension. Shaking the fund is political, but the damage will come from future generations. If the yield drops, there is no problem at the moment. If there is no money to pay the pension after 20 or 30 years, the next generation must fill it. Only two criteria are necessary: ​​profitability and stability. The national pension is never a pension of the regime.

Journalist of Jong Jong Jung's Wellness Team