[ad_1]
Negotiations between ruling parties and opposition parties of ruling and opposition parties have stalled over who should be the Chief Justice of the Judiciary .
Representatives of the ruling parties and the opposition met to discuss the conclusion of the round on the 9th, but they ran up against the position of the Chief Justice. . The Democratic Party made the logic of "catching up with the first opposition party". Hong said: "After the meeting," the judiciary is the problem, "he said," all lawmakers believe that the opposition party should use the criminal justice system to catch up with the reason that he controls the state. "A spokesman for Kang Byung-won said," The Korean government's insistence on securing a non-compliant criminal justice system without improving the system demonstrates its intention to keep the tools of the struggle and keep the law under control. "
The South Korean party insisted that the Democrats consider the president of the judiciary as a" unilateral solo. "Kim Seong-tae, deputy representative of Kim Sung-tae, said, "The Democratic Party advocates a criminal justice system." He said: "As a reformist legislative coalition, the Democratic Party is supposed to monopolize the legislature after state power and local.I can not give up the greedy and undemocratic idea of establishing a system. "
The Department of Justice is the" gateway to final entry "before the bill pbaded by the standing committee is submitted to the plenary session.According to section 86 of the Act on the National Assembly, the Department of Justice is responsible for considering whether the contents of the bill is unconstitutional and whether it conflicts with other laws and to badess the relevance of this term.
There was controversy over the issue, delaying the pbadage The political party acting as chief justice became a "senator" because it has the power to amend the main law.In particular, when the first opposition party will take over the president of the judicial power of the 17th National Assembly, the opposition party will be able to bypbad the bill. the time of the 19th National Assembly, the ruling parties and the opposition were in conflict. Lee Sangmin, the opposition party of the Democratic Party, which was the party of the opposition, refused to sign the bill electronically. In December 2013, the same party, Park Young-seon, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, refused to propose a bill on the promotion of foreign investments. At that time, the ruling party, the party in power, accused the judiciary of being an anchor, and the opposition refuted it as a "control."
The future right party is the one that the Korean side takes on the duty of the judiciary, according to custom. At the same time, he acts as a mediator by providing additional devices to limit the authority of the judiciary. Kim Gwan-young, the leader of the ruling party, said after the meeting, "I will negotiate the distribution of the judiciary and measures to improve the system and negotiate with them," he said.
[ad_2]
Source link
