[ad_1]
Candidate Kim Sun-soo (right) is in talks with a court official before the beginning of the hearing of the 23rd National Assembly. Kim said, "I withdrew from the ministry after the justice of the Supreme Court," he said, "I will maintain political neutrality." [변선구 기자]
Kim Sun-soo (57) tells the controversy over the political bias surrounding the justice of the Supreme Court: "My life as Minister of Justice should begin by breaking the relationship with Minbyeon (advocates for a democratic society)" .
Kim is proud to have been a member of the Ming who played an important role in the democratization of our society, during a hearing at the National Assembly held on the 23rd.
However the role of the Supreme Court Justice and the role of Mindan members are clearly different. "He left the ministry immediately after the Supreme Court judges, I will keep political neutrality as justice."
Over the last two days, candidate Kim, Myeong-soo, appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, is a representative progressive law. It was a controversial story when he was the head of the defense council at the time of the judgment on the dissolution of the Progressive Party.
During the Roh Moo-hyun administration, Mr. Moon also became a member of the board of directors when he was Minister of Civil Affairs. The Liberal Democratic Party has called for the resignation of Kim Jong Il, saying: "In addition to the corruption of politics and neutrality, Kim is very ineligible as a judge of the Supreme Court." Kim's statement of a break with the ministry at the hearing of the day is interpreted as revealing his intention to break this controversy.
Kim even explained the National Security Act and explained her willingness to change. He said, "For example, even if Min-bi calls for the abolition of the National Security Law, the Supreme Court Judge can not rule on the current National Security Law."
Kim also explained the story of the secretary of judicial reform. "I know that there are people who doubt that I can maintain political neutrality," he said. "I lived off the politics of reality and I did not do any civil work at all".
On the day of the hearing, questions from opposition lawmakers were released. Kim Seung-hee, a free member of the Korean National Assembly, said: "Is not this a violation of the ruling of the Constitutional Court beyond criticism at the time of the dissolution? " Just after the ruling of the Constitutional Court, Mr. Kim made a statement saying that he had been sentenced to death for the Republic of Korea's democracy and sentenced to death for himself. Kim said, "The expression (but the writer) was able to do well." It's a different problem to make a logical interpretation of the decision (comment, critique, and comment) and d & # 39; Accepting or not accepting the decision. "
The suspicion of the contract was also raised.Kim plans to buy an apartment in Seocho-gu, Seoul in 2000, and the price of $ 50,000. acquisition of 475 million won was reduced to 200 million won, which reduced the acquisition tax of about 6.8 million won. "Kim said:" I agree with the mistake, "he said," real estate transactions are due to practice when the reporting was not mandatory. "
On the day of the trial, Kim said," He is difficult to conclude that there has been a trial transaction based on the content of the investigation up to now. "The court wants the court to regain confidence" said.
[ad_2]
Source link
