[ad_1]
|
| Actor Sang-Eun Lee / News 1 © News1 |
A day is long and the "debt" (debt, too, I was a flock) continues. The exposure of past money borrowing or fraud to the family of an artist is not unknown. It is also called "bitumen", which appears to "me too" (I say too). "It's been a long time," he says.
Être Be fraudulent on the part of the parents of Microdat & # 39; → planned for a new publication
Recently, it was reported that the online community had been fraudulently damaged by Microdat's parents, known to the media since the 19th century. At first he was "fake" and "legal", but his parents were charged with fraud 20 years ago and he was convicted of being charged for settling in New Zealand .
On December 21, he showed his willingness to meet the victims by apologizing for his first statement. As the controversy continued, he said that he would stop the activities on the 25th.
The police show their willingness to join the group. It is a tough attitude that they will stop as soon as they are trampled on Korean soil.
Ax "Mother Axis borrowed money". → agree with the victim
While the controversy surrounding the purchase of Microdot Parent has become a hot topic, the financial damages caused by the parents of the entertainers are exposed. On the 26th, a former college A student, Kim Moo, mother of a hip-hop musician, told the media that he had loaned Kim 1 000 000 after the IMF, but had not received it. neither contacted.
It is said that the ax is a soft response to the live broadcast of SNS, saying: "It already ends legally", "it's not temporary" and "if it's 10 million won , it's the price for a month. "
However, the ax said on the 27th: "I contacted the victims since last night, I dispelled misunderstandings and decided to pay them with moral responsibility as a son.
 |
| Microdot ax Beefin (from the left) / Photo = Kwon Hyunjin, journalist © News1 |
Être Being fraudulent towards non-parents & # 39; → Legal liability for pecuniary damages, defamation
A mother recently reported on her online bulletin board that her parents had been scammed by their parents and had received a total of 23 million won, which was also reported in the media on the 27th. lent about 15 million won of rice and 8 million won in cash to his parents, who made the rice pastry from 1988 to 2004, but did not receive it.
On the same day, Rain's father met with Mr. A, but he was unable to reach a consensus because of differences in positions on both sides.
"I tried to meet my opponent and communicate with him, but I could not confirm the original, the promissory note or the book instead of the meeting." The victims claimed to have insulted the family, I asked for a settlement of 100 million won. "
The non-party stated: "We, as well as the affiliate's artist fees, will fairly confirm the amount of debt claimed by the other party, and the non-principal will be liable for the interest of the son as that son,
"However, we seriously undermine the honor of our artist, father and mother, especially the deceased, through malicious interviews and suggestions (such as punishment, fraud, martial law, etc.)." We will proceed to all possible judicial procedures for civil and criminal justice. "
"The father of Mama Muwin does not pay money". → a smooth settlement
In the afternoon of the 27th, an online message indicated that Mamu Muchin had not received the money promised to his father.
He told his parents that he was divorced and that he would not contact his father. "I do not really know where my father lives, what he does and how he goes," he said. The situation makes me confused and confused, but I will try to solve it with my family. I'm sorry for my members too. "
"I'm fraudulent towards my father's father" → 10 years of debt repayment & # 39;
On the morning of 28th, the actor Cha Yeol-he declared that he had paid off his father's debt. It is a statement that a family member of a victim disclosed that his father had been sentenced to three years in prison for a fraudulent land transaction in 2015 and that he was about to be released next year. According to the victim's complaint, Cha Yeoleryun's father was alleged to have used his daughter's name to buy the victim's land for one billion won.
He stated that he was paying 1 billion won for his father's debt. According to the Sankeil official, Sangyeol was 19 when his father's bankruptcy broke up his family and he had no contact with his father. Once the name was known, the company used the performance fee to pay off its debts.
ichi @
[ad_2]
Source link
