Kim Kwan-jin says "transition" and Kim Kyung-soo should "reflect"

Kim Kyung-soo, governor of Gyeongnam Province, was arrested on March 30 for allegedly manipulating the ratings rankings with Kim Dong-won, the "drunken king" in the 2017 presidential election.

Media Today, reporters such as Chosun Ilbo, Joongang Ilbo and Dong-A Ilbo are watching the arrest of former Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin and Kim Ji-na, accused of manipulating the police. public opinion through the Armed Forces Cyber ​​Command of the DRC between 2011 and 2013. I compared them. In addition to the restraint shown by Kim Kwan-jin, I also examined the point of view of the NIS comment case at the time of Park Geun-hye.

The conservative newspaper said Kim Kwan-Jin,Kim Kwan-jin is a sign of security& # 39 ;, "Kim Kwan-jin was the person he hated the most& # 39; I am convinced He focused on human aspects and achievements and published an editorial that excessive redemption was excessive. However, he wrote the editorial of Kim Jong –

In particular, Chosun Ilbo reported that the manipulation of the commentary "Drunk King" was more serious than that of Park Geun-hye's NIS commentary. The editorial of the 31st day, "The decision of Choi, Sang-Keun, the decision of the presidential election, It is hundreds of times larger than the NIS commentary (410,000 times). the INS was that the stage of handling comments was relatively small and focused on small sites, "he said.

▲ Editorial by Chosun Ilbo on the 31st.

The NIS comment case is an incident involving officials such as intelligence agencies and armed forces. The "drunkenness" incident is a civil dimension and there is one essential difference (related article: Park, Hoon, The Daily reported that the "Drunk King" case was more serious than the # 39; NIS comment case and that it was a serious matter or that it was essentially the same.

In an editorial on January 31, Chosun Ilbo said: "The NIS comment is a crime with the mobilization of state institutions, but distorting the rights of the people and undermining the electoral system Is not different from both cases ".

Then the Chosun Ilbo How was Kim Kwan-jin, accused of having led from 2010 to 2012 the former cyber-commander to the political party to support his pbadport and criticize the opposition, reportedly reported to him? former Minister of Defense?

Chosun Ilbo wrote an article highlighting his humanity at the time of Kim's arrest. November 15, 2017, page 1 "The last words of Kim Kwan-jin during the war …" Men are wrong. "The article describes Kim as a sacrificing leader for his men.

The article says: "After the beginning of the agricultural incident on the Korean Peninsula, the population has seen many detainees who have been brought to justice and brought to justice.This is the first time that Kim is relieved of all responsibility. "" For many, his redemption has had a greater impact, "he said. "He's been a sign of the security of the Republic of Korea for more than a decade, he was arrested with the replacement of the regime."

▲ Chosun Ilbo on November 15, 2017.

When Kim Kwan-jin was arrested, Chosun Ilbo did not release the arrest herself. Former Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin, arrested on Saturday, November 11, 2017, did not take much of the floor on the 13th, while the newspaper was not available, Sunday after the day of his detention. On November 13, Chosun Ilbo, page 1, "The military and intelligence agencies of MB are treated unfairly." In this article, Kim briefly mentions the takeover of his former minister, Kim. On page 5, "Kim Kwan-jin, the next target is the public relations officer in front of the port" was not the subject of Kim's takeover. Chosun Ilbo said that he had focused on Kim's release during the detention period and after the release of the Constitutional Court, as opposed to some reports on Kim's takeover.

Part of the Joongang Ilbo column of November 13, 2017.

JoongAng Ilbo has published a column directly criticizing the takeover of Kim Kwan-jin in 2017 at the time. On November 13, 2017, Kim Jeong-jin, who had to send him to the cell, is a representative example of the time of advertising.

This column begins with "Kim Kwan-jin, former Secretary of Defense, who was the one Kim Jong Eun of North Korea hated the most". "Kim Kwan-jin will not be able to say that he has always lived seven years as a senior defense minister and chief of security, always following all the procedures and principles," he said. declared. I wrote. This article says: "The punishment is proportional to the size of the sin.If the justice is over, it becomes cruel." The real reason that Kim Kwan-jin was sent to the cell is that he wants to capture former president Lee Myung-bak, he will have nothing to say about political retaliation and targeting investigations. "

This view was the same in the Dong-A Ilbo. The Dong-A Ilbo was arrested on November 15, 2017 in an editorial titled "Who will laugh if the three former presidents are arrested", and the former Defense Minister, Kim Kwan-jin, was arrested for having been commented on by the cyber-command. Kim said Kim Jong-jin, Nam Jae-joon and Lee Byeong-ho, former presidents of the National Assembly, were extremely worried that North Koreans would be the most feared soldiers.

▲ Editorial of Dong-A Ilbo of the 31st.

On the other hand, these newspapers demanded "macabre thinking" of the ruling powers in Kim's redemption. In an editorial on Jan. 31, Dong-a Ilbo said, "Kim Kyung-soo's comments must be criticized, as is the ruling power." "He said.

▲ Editorial on Joongang Ilbo on the 31st.

JoongAng Ilbo also wrote in an editorial on January 31 that Kim Kyung-soo, governor of Gyeongsangnam-do court, was to reveal the truth only with the case law. In this editorial, JoongAng Ilbo said, "It appears that the judge sentenced Kim to a sentence based on the evidence and the case law." It is true that the opposition to the election of Choi, who contributed to the regime change, as well as the controversy over the results of the presidential election ".

Kim Jong-soo, governor of Gyeongsangnam-do, is on the verge of controversy over the fairness of the presidential election.