I am curious about the reaction of "Chosun Ilbo"

"If you do a study on the political biases revealed in the reports of major Korean newspapers, do you think that the prejudice of the opposition will be about 9 to 1?"

Roh Moo-hyun, president of the Foundation, said: In this video, Yu wrote a series of articles on "Territoriality that has lost its equity", based on Park Geun-hye-Moon's report. Jae-in, researcher at the Press Research Institute of the Seoul National University. It was reported that the Chosun Ilbo Media Research Institute had received 30 million won for this report.

In this video, Yu said, "We wanted to check whether Chosun Ilbo's information that terrestrial broadcasting was skewed towards the house was authentic or not." The conclusion is summarized in this single word. "The reasons for not doing this study do not make sense." Yu also predicted, "If the Hankyoreh conducts a study of four universities in the university research institute, it will be totally skewed in favor of the opposition, with the exception of JTBC."

Where was President Yushimin? This series of 17 stories, from 11 to 15, with the exception of the 14th day, has sparked fears both inside and outside the press. The series, which criticized the prejudices of the terrestrial radio and television show and the trends in favor of the government and the ruling party, was criticized for its prejudices and injustice from the beginning to the end of its content (Related article : "Press scandal").

If so, what is the position of Yun Seok-min, a professor in the Department of Media and Information Studies at Seoul National University? In the first article on November 11, the Chosun Ilbo Media Research Institute did not reveal the fact that he had commissioned the research; it was therefore doubtful whether there was any question of equity. There is a bar.

Professor Yoon, who recently appeared on KBS1, also said: "The Chosun Ilbo was the first to offer research on land biases". According to KBS on 23 November, Professor Yoon's suggestion puts forward the allegation that Professor Yoon has asked for funding for the first time. Professor Yoon claimed that KBS was first revealed on the 24th in a press release before the broadcast.

First, is it the "Joseon" concealment project?

"I remember it was early September of last year." The media reporter in Chosun Ilbo called me and I thought terrestrial broadcasting, especially the bias of some radio news programs, was serious, I asked for comments.

I therefore refused the right answer on the spot. I can not speak with just a few examples, and when I quote it, especially when I quote it, it sounds really serious, so I refused to do it, so do not write this emotionally like this article. "

He said that he had contacted her again a week later. The question was whether we could study news radio programs in a systematic, scientific and complete way rather than just articles. Yoon faced such an intention and declared that he accepted the search. Professor Yoon pointed out that the order was placed first.

"So I was very surprised and delighted, and I also wanted to do it when I had the opportunity, so that's the research I've done." I do not know why the Chosun Ilbo replied that there was no order, but contact me first I was informed that it was possible, then I sent a research proposal, of course, and I wrote and submitted a research proposal. "

But the clarification of what he said was completely different. KBS said that the Chosun Ilbo Media Research Institute had received "a request for research funding for the badysis of equity changes in public broadcasting" from the professor Yoon Seokmin of the Seoul National University in September 2018, "This is not true that this has been done."

"Chosun Ilbo used the report of his research service as the essential basis for attacking terrestrial broadcasters and trying to hide the facts."

Chung Joon-hee, a professor at Newspaper Broadcasting, of Chung-ang University, said: "If you consult the guidelines of the report on the survey on the electoral law, you will reveal the institutions that request polls and agencies that conduct the investigation. " In the case of Chosun Ilbo, "It is difficult to see that the investigation was conducted at the request of the Ministry of Justice,

Empower each other <조선>Professor Yoon

"When the academy receives the research service and writes the report, the media accept it and the politicians expose the typical cartel of the press, academia and politics that attacks policies on the basis of report that "broadcasting is unfair".
"The Chosun Ilbo should not seriously upset the unfair frame of a healthy show, but Chosun Ilbo should seriously consider the question of whether he is right."

On October 13, the PD Association criticized the "fair earthly" series with a firm statement. On the same day, the headquarters of the KBS National Union of Press Workers (KBS) also stated: "Professor Yoon is a member of the Audiovisual Communications Review Committee, on the recommendation of the ruling party under the Park Government Geun-Hye, and is one of the external editors who write articles on Chosunilbo ". It is a rational evaluation to judge only the mechanical balance regardless of the seriousness or age change of the material. "

So what did Professor Yoon say about the feasibility debate? Professor Yoon said, "I think I can address the vulnerable bias of the lower level rather than the concept of equity, and I think the current programs are the most public programs that influence the training of students. public opinion, I explained it as follows.

"We gave the five graduate students who participated in the research to autonomy without giving them a direct guide, and according to whether they were in favor of the party in power or opposed to the party of the opposition , they had a bias of -2, -1, 0, In the case of scathing and ambiguous statements to judge, the students discussed and got an agreement. "

The fairness of this research itself has also been criticized. That the serialization of 17 articles including the page of a page for five days be fair and that the graduate student who is not the criterion that can certify the academy can trust the standard judged by the stand-alone standard. On that day, KBS Professor Choi Kyung-young criticized his comment on the 23rd.

"So, Chosun Ilbo will badume the responsibility of Professor Yoon Sukmin, and Professor Yoon Seok-min will give five graduate students the order of Chosun Ilbo, so I'm not responsible." I do not like the way I look at it.

Lost trust

"Chosun Ilbo media group and the collaboration team of the industry and the academy of the Seoul National University signed a contract to badyze the objectives of the program, I did not intervene at all and I focused on design and research based on the knowledge of the area of ​​expertise. "This is the domain of Chosun Ilbo that deals so much with research in the Chosun Ilbo .

On the 13th, when the controversy gained momentum, Professor Yoon said during a telephone interview with KBS1. Chosun Ilbo said that it was only the Chosun Ilbo area and that his research was not a problem.

In a telephone interview the same day, Professor Yoon stressed: "The research was conducted in a strict and independent manner." And the controversy over the bias in the series, which was reported as "unique" before the publication of the research results, has reached its peak. In addition, Professor Yoon was a regular columnist.

In this interview, Yoon said, "When the report was made public, some media tried to undermine the purity and the importance of the research by asking them to ask where they had received the research funds from the content of the search. " In all attempts to sell research as biased I will answer in a certain way. "

Has the difficult position of Professor Yoon changed? But what? Even if time has pbaded, the "fact" does not change. The series itself was biased, research was ordered, and even the seventeen series of articles had no repercussions in the press. It is rather a series that has helped to rethink the change of influence.

In addition, Professor Yoon was not immune to such criticism. "I have never commissioned a study" or I am a teacher at Yoon, who seems to have changed position late. The following article, titled "Representative Lee Jung-Hwan on the 16th, presented below, reveals it.

What can Professor Yoon refute about this? In addition, what kind of rebuttal can be invoked on the day of the president of the president who said that "why not do this study does not make sense"? The place where the controversy has lost all credibility is like today <조선일보>I am not a media information research institute at the Seoul National University.

"I think that Professor Yoon's knowledge and consciousness should be believed, but I first badyzed the bias of terrestrial broadcasting with the support of Chosun Ilbo's research fund. even is absurd. "