"Fire, real story" workshop Gwangju apartment fire conclusion "fire"



[ad_1]

[Gwangju = NewSea] The court found that the fire of the 20th mother was the fire of the Gwangju apartment, which had been used for "fire or fire" since the police investigation until In court. 19659002] The Gwangju District Court's 11th Criminal Justice Division sentenced A (23 years old) to 20 years' imprisonment for killing an arsonist on 13 March.

On the 31st, at 1:51 am, I thought I saw no improvement in the conditions of education and life of the children and I decided to light a fire in a small room where three brothers and sisters slept. He was accused of killing children by burning a blanket on a lighter near the doorway.

A police officer in charge of the investigation stated that Mr. A had been burned while shooting a cigarette on a bed placed on the side of a small room where his children were sleeping, and that he had applied the allegations of homicide and slaughter, I had to.

The police were of the opinion that A took into account the obligation to ensure that the cigarette was not extinguished and that the fire was not working properly in case important fire.

The judgment of the prosecutor who delivered the case was different.

Reported during an emergency medical examination after the rescue, "I did not turn off the gas burner to boil the ramen, so the fire went off. is produced. " However, after the police recall, "I had a fire I think there is a corner."

The prosecution started six investigations against Mr. A, a precise badessment of the fire scene, history of phone calls, text messaging, badysis of messaging conversations and integrated psychological badysis.

In this process we have been informed of the results of the sword test, which included the fact that "the synthetic cushions made of cigarettes (so-called microfiber duvets) could not be lit."

We received the results of the tests of Fire of the scientific investigation department of the Great Sword according to which it is estimated that the firing point started inside the room, from the entrance door of the small

The prosecution also falsified A's statement that he was a small room with a fire.

There was no mark of carburation on the socks that Mr. A wore, and Mr. A's face had no burns because of the radiant heat.

The prosecutor decided that Mr. A was in a living room, not a small room.

On the day of the fire, Mr. A sent a message suggesting a fire to his friend and ex-husband, used a mobile phone for 40 minutes until the ears rested, and was in financial trouble In fact, I also confirmed the fact that I was charged with refunds and refunds related to Internet products.

When the prosecution collects these facts, it is held that A did not make a fire by mistake, but fired it.

million. A and his attorney told the court that although he acknowledged responsibility for the performance, he did not light the bed with a lighter with the intention of setting fire to it. He said.

The court said: "Considering that the burning area of ​​the fire scene is small and the lower part of the door, including the interior of the room, especially in the interior of the door, is mainly lost, the court ruled that the lower part "It is estimated that there is a possibility of human expression by human factors."

"The body d & # 39; Investigation, relying on Mr. A's argument about the cause of the fire, puts a cigarette butt, a cigarette butt with a fire on a bed sheet, a However, the microfibres and cotton futons were not inflamed by the nature of the material, and it was confirmed that the cigarette was naturally digested after burning. "

In addition, he said," It is badumed that the first conflagration that led to the emotional conduct of the emotion was direct inflammation using a lighter, if it was a quilt. "

The court said:" According to the results of each feeling and the testimony of the evaluator, Mr. A's argument against the cause of the fire that a cigarette butt or a cigarette butt with a fire is transferred to a futon, Mr. A's badertions about the cause and location of the incident are not convincing. "

About l & # 39; A fire event, the court said: "Since no other combustible material was found at the fire site, it is difficult to find the cause of the fire. the fire other than the direct ignition of the bed.

Then, "Mr. A seemed to have known that a fire had already occurred a long time before the fire occurred, and he was still sending messages to his ex-wife. Husband without any effort to put out the fire Even in an imminent situation, I sent a message of "I'm sorry" to my friend, and this behavior is not easily understood by common sense. "

[email protected]


[ad_2]
Source link