"I am guilty of religious conscience objection …" New Checking of New Case – Chosun.com

Entry 2018.11.29 17:01

The Supreme Court has asked Jehovah's Witnesses, who have been found guilty of refusing to serve, to judge whether they are "justified on the grounds of military service". The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that conscientious objection to conscientious objection to conscientious objection by a "true conscience" was a decision based on the judge's right to the "conscience". conscientious objection.

The Supreme Court 3 (Moo-suk Judge of the Supreme Court) remanded the case to the Changwon District Court Appeals Department after violating a sentence sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment for violation of the law on military service.

The court said: "The conscientious objection to conscientious objection considering Korea's economic power, its defense capabilities and the people's high security consciousness does not seem to have a lot of difficulty in achieving national security and homeland defense. "

"To force a true conscientious objector to fulfill his military service obligations, accompanied by mbadacres, military training and the punishment of such breaches constitutes an excessive restriction of freedom of conscience."

The judge said: "The conviction is based on the previous opinion of the Supreme Court." He can not admit that conscientious objection to conscientious objection is a legitimate ground for conscientious objection. "

Seo was put on trial after receiving a notice of admission to the Army Training Center in December 2014, but without giving any reason without a valid reason.

The first and second sentences were sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment, in these terms: "The reason for not pursuing a religious conscience is not a legitimate ground for objection of consciousness. " But he did not stop because he did not care about escaping.

The "religious conscience" of Seo Seong seems to be taken into account in the final report. "Awareness recognized as a just cause is a firm conviction, a truth, and everything that is not part of life is under the influence and it is not easy to change easily", a- he declared. "In concrete cases, circumstantial and circumstantial facts" This should be judged by a method of proof. "