[ad_1]
[Kang Jin-ah] Reporter Kang Jin-ah: It is worth mentioning that the National Council of Judicial Supervision required a greater disclosure of original documents related to the abuse of the judicial authority such as the suspicion of "transaction "The meeting will be held at 10 am on the day of the second extraordinary session of the Goyang City Research and Judicial Training Institute, Gyeonggi Province.
At the meeting, the Supreme Court There is a problem with the initial disclosure of the file.
Since then, the prosecution has opened an investigation into allegations of "lawsuits" and a document that was the subject of an investigation by a special investigation team, but which was not accessible to the public. The contents of what has been revealed to the outside.
In this controversy, the meeting was held at the meeting to discuss the contents of the remaining unofficial files, including the text of the remaining unfulfilled documents. It is likely that the court will not disclose it because it is currently investigating the prosecution.
Previously, the meeting of judicial representatives had requested disclosure of the full text of the 410 files reviewed by the Special Investigation Team on March 1. . After that, the Administrative Office of the Court released the original text of 98 files, but suggested that the rest of the records be accessible from a limited number of judges or a conference room where holds the meeting of the judicial representatives. The institutional improvement program will also be discussed. The prosecution is expected to improve the Supreme Court justice process and suspend court support for the Supreme Court judiciary. In the National Assembly, a hearing on the candidacy of Kim Sun-soo (57 years old, Institute for Research and Judicial Training), who is one of three candidates for the new justice of the Supreme Court, will take place. Meanwhile, when the candidate for the Supreme Court is required, the administrative authorities However, it was pointed out that it was not appropriate that the judiciary, which is responsible for the judicial administration, participates in the Supreme Court Judge's hearing to be judged. Recently, it became a background that the voice of the separation of the judicial administration and the lawsuit was raised because of the suspicion of "trial transaction".
At the same time, there is a request to disclose personnel verification data to candidates for Supreme Court justices. There is a need for the public to publicize and discuss the views of various social groups in order to verify the selection process for the Supreme Court justice candidate.
In addition, various proposals for the improvement of the judicial system were launched, as well as proposals to update the recommendation procedures of the Nominating Committee to Supreme Court Justices and the Judicial Nominating Committee. of the Constitutional Court. ▲ proposal for the improvement of the judicial development committee ▲ judge's proposal to reflect the opinion of the district court judge (recommendation of the district court judge's candidate) ▲ distribution of the judicial charge ▲ equalization of the district court
[ad_2]
Source link
