It is difficult for us to reject the suggestion of "

See more photos
▲ .
ⓒ Kim Sung-wook	Related Images

"I have not been able to know how much I spent with the data, but I have no obligation to report. "

This is the claim of Presidential Representative Roh Roh-young of the Ministry of Justice. The spokesman said: "The spokesman said that it is the expense that is used for an information or investigation activity that requires confidentiality and that the judiciary must the

[No:19659007] Meeting with reporters in Yeouido Parliament in Seoul on the morning of the press conference on "Local Political Innovation," the National Assembly is neither an NIS nor an agent of police, and no investigation or information activity requires confidentiality. "" It is desirable to eliminate all costs of deterioration. "

In 2013, the National Assembly announced its spending of 24 billion won.The receipt is not attached, so it is not possible to enter the details but this is the first time that the outline of the spending of the National Assembly is leaked.In May, the Supreme Court ruled that the expenditure was to be disclosed, and the National Assembly responded to the request for disclosure of the three-year PSP.

A representative of the National Assembly, who insisted on the abolition of the National Assembly, proposed that each political party disclose its use future transparently.

"Every party that receives the extra money must disclose how much money they have received and how they spend it each month," he said. "I think the legislature is in agreement with this decision. "

[관련 기사] The Government is preparing the draft e law for the abolition of the superpower Noh Sook-chan, statement of conscientious objection, "I can not accept it"

The following is a summary of responses from representatives and reporters in the office.

Reason for revealing something "

▲ .
	Related Photos

– Solidarity Participation reveals the details of the expenditures of the National Assembly that were obtained by requesting the disclosure of
"With the only data, I do not know how it was used because I do not have the obligation to report it. The story is that the rain of expenses is not subject to settlement of accounts. If it does not disclose how it was used,

The Supreme Court's decision to disclose the cost of the National Assembly is not intended to direct the private sector to the public, but it does not recognize the cost of the budget of the National Assembly. Talking about the disclosure of identity theft charges for security activities used in information or investigation activities,

I ask, first of all, we should not reduce the total amount of non-deductible in the budget of the National Assembly for 2019. The receipt is not treated, Second, the rest of the budget of 2018, which is already paid and organized, requires each party to disclose how much money it has received and how it is used each month for the public.

– It was said that I was preparing to launch the bill.
"I am currently working on it, I know, but it seems that the party has not yet been clearly defined, so it seems to be waiting."

– Will it be he adopted by the National Assembly?
"If I respect the judgment of the Supreme Court, I think that should be done."

– Some lawmakers say that it's not too much to reduce longevity, but the # 39, eliminate completely.
"There may be some who think so.There is a reason why it is not possible to disclose the details of the deterioration unless it is used for life or for personal use.There is a way to be transparently managed and written under a variety of names such as specific business expenses or business promotion expenses. </ p> <p> Because the Assembly national is neither an NPA nor a police officer and that there is no investigation or activity of information that requires confidentiality, I think it is desirable to respect the decision of the Supreme Court and eliminate all expenses. "

" The story of being transparent is to reveal the details. It is said that the deterioration is abolished. The special activity tax does not reveal where it is written. As a result, the cost of special events can not be transparent. This is not a special activity tax when it becomes transparent. In this situation, even if you reduce the amount of loot, if someone asks the Supreme Court to disclose it, another order will be made public. (19659007) Copyright Holder (c) OhmyNews (Citizen Journalist), Reprint Without Permission and Prohibition of Redistribution