[ad_1]
Kang Yi Jae, a lawyer, attracted attention because of a rumor that the internal military document, which reviewed the prosecution and the proclamation of martial law, After sharing an article entitled "We have to go to a candlelight show" on his Facebook on June 6, he wrote: "I'm writing a novel. Distortion.
Through the article, Kang Kang said, "When you do not agree, if you throw something like this, you will not be able to see the real front and back, check the facts, I do not see my people at the level of an excited dog, "he argued, adding that" candlelight vigils and martial law are used together to make it clear that is a different story and a distorted report. "
The lawyer said:" This is not a revision of martial law and martial law, but the fight against a police station, a violent riot that took over the police, martial law and martial law. "" How do you respond and suppress when you think the same state of riot? "
" Right now, What "one", "he ordered lawyers from the river," because I wanted to cover something? CEO of Jeong Hae-sung? According to the statements of the opposition and the critics of power by the judiciary, it is not just about d & # 39; a "human intervention" or detachment, but d & # 39; an "abuse of authority" and "misuse" an abuse".
The same day, Kang said, "Most of the items that come out these days are the eyes of" Mae ", said Kang Kang, a lawyer. You can understand the fact only if you read it carefully. It's a tired thing. In addition, he published a paper titled "Measures to Conduct Mortality and Joint Work" and criticized Democratic Legislator Lee.
"This title of the martial law article to the candlelight vigil, and many netizens are eager to see it," said Han Kang, lawyer, "as if to march against the Korean people who hold A candlelight vigil is read as if it was to declare it.
In addition, Lee Chul-hee, a member of the Democratic Party, said: "On March 5, the Democratic Party commander declared : "It's a plan to achieve martial arts and collective work in early March 2017, and published an 8-page document that he reported to the Secretary of Defense.
In this document, the military human rights center held a press conference on June 6 and argued that "the document is a clear plan of coup and all the people involved are guilty of guilty in the criminal code.The prosecution plans to consider the possibility of entering the C heongwadae with big protesters disagree with the results and declaring the war command and martial law.
The force of martial law included 200 tanks, 550 armored vehicles, 4,800 armed forces and 1,600 militia soldiers. And 1400 troops command the special force. Specifically, there was a brigade of 30 divisions and an airborne brigade at Cheong Wa Dae, two brigades in the Gwanghwamun area, two brigades in the Gwanghwamun area, nine brigade brigades, two divisions in the Seoul government complex, and a brigade in the capitol.
This is different from the review of the military dispatch system, which was drafted by the Attorney General of the Department of National Defense for a response to the National Assembly. In response, the center said: "The plan to control the area with tanks and armored vehicles and remove citizens by the Ministry of Public Security is similar to that of 5‧18 Gwangju." In the mailbox, the chief of staff
The center also pointed out that [the former head of national security Kim Kwan-jin who reported the document, the former Han Defense Minister Min-gu, former commander-in-chief Jo Hyun-cheon who reported the document, (Now the deputy chief of the army) who allegedly was involved in the military mobilization. "
[ad_2]
Source link
