Japanese Mitsubishi victims also won Dafa

News 1

The victims of forced labor in Japan were all won in a lawsuit against Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in Japan. This is the first major decision recognizing the responsibility for the application of Mitsubishi, a Japanese war criminal. The Supreme Court has previously acknowledged liability for damages resulting from the forced dismissal of Shin Il-Chul Kim (Nippon Steel) on March 30.

The Supreme Court, the second judge of the Supreme Court, confirmed on June 29 that the victims of the Chosun Workers Protection Center, including Yang Geum-deok, and a survivor, had filed a lawsuit against the plaintiffs. According to the decision, the victims and survivors will receive 100 million won and 150 million won of alimony per person.

Ms. Yang and others were mobilized in May 1944 in Nagoya aircraft manufacturing plant at Mitsubishi Heavy Industries under the pressure of "women's mental work order" and the Japanese director. They filed a lawsuit against the Japanese government and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in March 1993, but in November 2008, the case was lost in the Supreme Court of Japan.

After that, they again filed a lawsuit in the Korean court in 2012 and won some one- or two-point wins. This time, the Supreme Court also confirmed that Mitsubishi 's judgment of accepting responsibility for compensation was correct.

In addition, the same judge (Supreme Court Justice Park Sang-ok) has confirmed the suspicion that forced labor victims such as Park Chang-hwan and 23 survivors would have awarded 80 million won in damages. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.

Park and others were forced to work in September and October 1944 and worked at the Hiroshima Machinery Shipyard and the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Shipyard. In May 2000, the company filed a lawsuit against the Busan District Court for compensation of 100 million won for damages resulting from forced labor and unpaid wages during forced labor.

In the first and second sentences, the plaintiffs ruled, but in May 2012, the Supreme Court dismissed them as plaintiffs. The decision was the final decision five years after receiving the refund in 2013.