[ad_1]
The working group on improving the disaster management system in communication has been formally launched with the fire of the KT communications district. At the end of the year, it is planned to tackle the problem of the disaster response system in terms of communication and to prepare measures to prevent recurrence.
Despite the ambitious launch, the road is difficult. There is only one month left until the end of the year. This means that it is imperative to take steps to avoid repetition of a communication disaster and take action to react quickly.
The Ministry of Science and Technology (MIC) organized the Disaster Telecommunications Working Group on the afternoon of 27th and held the first meeting at the Government Building in Gwacheon.
Mang Won-ki, deputy minister of the Ministry of Information and Communication, was at the head of the TF. Park Yoon-Kyu, head of the policy commission, and Lee Young-mi, head of the central radio directorate, were given the role of head of the policy team. 39; inspection.
It is feared that measures to transfer the financial burden to private telecommunications companies will be more important than the government budget on the first day of the meeting.
■ Current situation verification plan, measures to avoid recurrence in a month?
The working group should focus on improving the system and checking the actual situation in the future.
An official from the Ministry of Information and Communication said: "The government plans to improve the management of the security of communication facilities by improving the claims management system of these facilities, by preparing manuals for each type of accident, explained.
Verification of the actual state is the expected procedure. The government should also inspect the state of Korea D grade, such as KT Ahn branch where the fire immediately occurred.
In addition to checking the actual situation, the system is focused on improving the system. It plans to take steps to prevent the recurrence of communication disasters and the measures to be taken to deal with them.
For example, it is planned to put in place a system to install fire prevention facilities in communication areas of less than 500 meters. As KT Ahn measures less than 150 meters, it is reported that there are not enough firefighting facilities.
In addition, it is expected that the system, such as the improvement of the disaster management system, the preparation of the intervention manual,
However, it is specified that the plan must be continued with a view to preparing countermeasures during the course of the year.
A telecommunications industry official said: "The provision of stable communication services is the most important issue, but we can not avoid the criticisms that have focused on the policy of reducing tariffs and marketing policy. early 5G ". This is not a solution, but part of the policy that needs to be pursued next year. "
■ What is the nature of public goods?
One of the main concerns is that it depends on access to communications as a public good.
"We have been tasked with judging from the point of view of national security and public life, which is very important for the security of the nation and for the fundamental security of the nation," said Yu Young-min, He said.
There is also the view that communication services should be considered public goods, in terms of public public goods and frequencies using domestic resources.
However, it was pointed out that the responsibility of private enterprises for public services was postponed.
An industry official said: "If telecom companies plan to improve the disaster helpline, telecom companies will accept it, but it seems difficult to come up with a plan for budget allocation.
"Even if a telecommunications company carries on commercial activities as a public resource, if it transfers responsibility for public goods to security, investment resources such as an additional back-up network will inevitably be taken out of them." the consumer's expenses. " If the government tries to take measures to protect the environment, it will be rational to take into account the status of private companies and to provide separate support measures. "
Source link
