MADAT · Axis "Debt"? An unforgivable mistake of the press

▲At the press conference held in July,Ⓒ Photos of articles

Beginning with Microdot (Shin Jae Ho), rapper hatchet (Dok2), Rain (Jung Ji Hoon), Mamma Mu whitening, actor Cha Yeol Ryun, C is as if the bombs were washed away and that the "report" of the victims poured in. In these cases, the debt of parents has become a problem. In contrast, Woo Ji-won, a former basketball player, has been controversial because of his flaw. It is suspected that he did not repay the 50 million won that he borrowed to his knowledge.

The exposed people manage the problems in their own way and the audience watches their various aspects with a watchful eye. In the case of Microdat, it was intensely engraved as a symbol of mismanagement. When the case of parental fraud was seriously evoked, MioDot, who was raising two rabbits for work and a romantic relationship, was worried that he was "baseless and that he would react fiercely".

It did not take much time until his attitude turned out to be a coincidence. When the parents' complaint was revealed and the nature of the case became apparent, the company did not have any other choice than to apologize. In addition, we all had a broadcast. It was difficult to see Micodad on television in the future. What would it be if Microdat was a little more careful. What would have happened if they had shown consideration to the victims who had endured tears in their eyes?

Wrapper Ax (Dok2) expressed deep dissatisfaction with the fact that her mother did not pay back 10 million won she had borrowed from her former students in the past. Through the SNS, he said, "Do not focus on micdat," he added. "My mother was not fraudulent and was the subject of court proceedings. I will pay you money when it comes to me. I did not know. I have never been caught and I have never been a fraud. "If that had been the case up to now, there would not have been a problem.

However, the ax went further from there and said: "Ten million won, it is money for a month only". Even though it was true, it was a useless pride of money and a ransom for the victim. Was it a hip sweater? The audience, who was already sensitive, was angry at the humiliating attitude of the ax. It turned out that after a while, the debt problem had been solved smoothly, but the reckless remarks of the ax would be heard.

In case of rain, he declared that he would actively repay the debt of his deceased mother and would have met the asylum seeker. However, he was forced to demand a settlement of 100 million won without the original promissory note and promissory note. In addition, it was confirmed that Huiin and Chaoyeol lived in a state in which the relationship with the father in question was in fact disconnected. In particular, he stated that he was paying off the debts of his father who had not traveled for 15 years and that the amount had reached 1 billion won.

The public is attentive to the "countermeasures" of the entertainers exposed to the debt. What is worrying is that the current atmosphere is in the form of "pneumoconiosis". Some issues need to be addressed together, but sometimes they seem to require a cautious approach. Although the public insists that he should not apply paternity, he focuses on how to approach the debt problem sincerely and to resolve it responsibly.

Of course, the money borrowed must be repaid. The debt should be liquidated. Who would object. But there is another who is frowned upon in this uncontrollable flow. This is the irrational attitude of the media. Some media have started to call it "Debtuu", which is called "Mitu", and some media have used the word "Debtu", and many media now publish it in the title of the article .

▲Articles on debts of families of artists have been reported as "Debt" for the movement "Mitu".Ⓒ Capturing the portal

It seems that the person who composed the word & # 39; Debtu & # 39; for the first time, or those who use it, thought that it was a proper name & # 39; or & # 39; free fall & # 39 ;. Maybe you hit your knees. Of course, they do not know the suffering and suffering that victims endure as a result of their debt and respect their final report, which is not protected by law. However, it is doubtful whether it is acceptable to use the word "debt", which is clear from "

Mitu is a movement and language that began in the desperate resistance of women. The Korean company has not yet responded to women's calls. This has just been announced. It is not only the condemnation of authors, but also the problem of the social institutional dimension. They also call the victim a "bamboo flap", ignoring their voices and denouncing them. The way to go is difficult, even from a distance.

▲An article reporting "debt" for the "Mitu" movement on the problem of debt of the family of artists.Ⓒ Twitter Capture

In Korea, Mitou is still in progress. It's a terrible and terrible gift. But is it possible to use myo as a parody without having to worry about it? Can you put it in your mouth like a joke without any consideration? If you know the weight of the tongue, do you think you should be more careful if you plan on going to hell until you speak the language? I'm afraid of the cold temperature of a society in incessant and incoherent boiling.