[ad_1]
& # 39; I understand & # 39; "Good," & # 39; patriotism & # 39;
This is a reaction from netizens who came to work when a car carrying Chief Justice Kim Myung Soo was attacked by an incendiary bomb. Most comments on the portal site aimed to defend Nami (74), who had thrown a molten bottle.
Supreme Court Terrorist judge in judicial mistrust
On November 27, at 9:05 am, Namo, the only protester in the Seoul Supreme Court, threw a bottle when Kim Myung-soo, the president of the Supreme Court, entered. The fire on the incendiary bomb was brought to the back wheel of the pbadenger car. Fortunately, the police on the scene immediately started a fire with fire extinguishers. Kim the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has no anomalies. The fireballs on the male clothes also evolved immediately and were not hurt differently.
The man was handed over to the police officer who was sent to the scene after being repressed by the police. The police found in their bags four more bottles of flammable substances that were supposed to be thinner. If you do not stop early, there could be additional crimes.
In some cases, it is a symbolic example of the status of the judiciary, which has fallen into suspicion of "legal farmers" in the case. The credibility of the court fell on the ground when the circumstances of various judicial proceedings were revealed. Meanwhile, cases in which the parties have failed to comply with the decisions of the losers have also increased. It is reported that the litigants who protested in court like Mr. In particular, there have been many cases in which individual demonstrations were organized on the basis of the trial results, but it is the first time that the Chief Justice acted directly against physical force.
More popular than anxiety … Crime related to personal action
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Kim Myung-soo, who was the target of terrorist attacks, was informed that he remained silent at the time of the allegations of abuse. judicial authority and the debate on the dismissal of judges. He has been on the board since he took office last September. The blacklist of judges, which the Supreme Court's special investigation team denied the existence in May, was revealed during the prosecution investigation, which was followed a review of the measures taken by the judicial staff. The search warrant issued by prosecutors against suspected judges of judicial farmers was dismissed one after the other by the court, with the exception of the case of Former Deputy Director Jong – This resulted from the fact that Chief Justice Kim had expressed his intention to cooperate with the prosecution in his June public address.
However, it is true that terrorist acts that violate the right to life are difficult to justify for any purpose. There is a lot of concern that the reaction of the applause to the expression of extreme anger directed against Chief Justice Kim is the main factor. Few comments criticizing terrorism have been found in articles posted on portal sites. He instead turned to the terrorist Namo as a "patriot" and "a father who lives and works hard to protect the moments of suffering". "I do not want to throw a little bit," said Kim Chae-chan, "I'm sorry to hear you're alive", "You have to throw a grenade" and "You have to throw one in the car Of the president."
In addition, the cause of the crime was a personal matter unrelated to the judicial farm. In a police investigation, Nam said: "Regarding the civil lawsuit, the court did not accept my allegations, so I was angry and engaged". He succumbed to his allegation that the National Agency for Agricultural Quality Management suffered damage by failing to comply with environmental certification. Since then, the Supreme Court has called for a fair trial and has demonstrated outside the main gate of the Supreme Court for about three months.
A lawyer in the legal profession said: "Even though the judiciary has exposed its problems and abandoned its position, it seems that society reacting to such a terrorist act is doing well." In order to prevent the proliferation of A disgusting or angry anger, the judiciary should eliminate the scourge of internal and external plagiarism and its transformation into a society. "
[ad_2]
Source link
