"Peritoneal dialysis is effective and hemodialysis is serious"

It has been argued that the government should supplement the system to provide patients with chronic renal failure with a choice of dialysis methods and manage the quality of treatment.

In 2017, among patients receive 92%. In comparison, only 8% of patients receive peritoneal dialysis.

Health professionals are aware that not only are many patients not familiar with peritoneal dialysis, but also have misperceptions. Currently, patients with chronic renal failure have limited options for dialysis.

However, recent economic results have shown that peritoneal dialysis is superior to hemodialysis in terms of cost and effectiveness.

Yesterday (20th)

Professor Lee Kun-Seet said, "In most countries, peritoneal dialysis is cheaper than hemodialysis and costs about 26% less in Korea."

Analysis that peritoneal dialysis is more effective than hemodialysis in all models except the dialysis method change and the model considering dialysis method change.

Professor Lee said: "In Taiwan, the hospital badessment is based on an increase in peritoneal dialysis patients." Meanwhile, Japan has implemented intensive patient education before dialysis, and revised medical treatments in April of this year. "On the other hand, the Korean government used about 2 trillion won for dialysis,

▲ Provide a differential number according to moderate ▲ Suggest an improvement in the calculation special treatment system, appropriate badessment of the quality of care, penalty for excessive use of medical care, and appropriate number of patient consultations

A senior member of the evaluation team, Yang Gui-hwa, also baderted that "the establishment of a system of evaluation of dialysis by the registration of patients."

▲ Professor Lee, K.

Regarding the reality of the man that of interest and care of dialysis patients, the Government also expressed sympathy. Lee Kang-hee, head of the Center for Disease Control, Lee Kang-hee, said: "The cost of dialysis patients was high and the interest in dialysis patients disappeared and the care no longer required. has not been systematized.

◇ After the operation of the headquarters and operation after the operation of the headquarters

That day, the consultation number of the consultation of the patient and the provision of the difference according to the degree of seriousness were raised,

Kim Seok-hyun, head of the Korea Institute of Medical and Health Research, said: "If the market has developed solely towards the & 9 39 39 39,,,,,,, hemodialysis, it is because of the market and the medical system ". I can not melt the water, so I look on one side. "

Therefore, the Director of the Welfare Division of the Insurance Benefits Division of the Department of Health and Welfare pointed out that it was not necessary to provide any benefits. It is not possible to discriminate the actors according to the degree of severity of the system.

Lee said: "The only part to consider is the addition of extraordinary cases such as pediatrics, and it is difficult to To get a difference in the degree of gravity, "and"

Professor Lee Kang-see of Konkuk University said, "Dialysis is a choice that changes the quality of life for all of life . "

In particular, peritoneal dialysis requires personal care, but that does not mean that you should educate and take care of yourself."

Professor Lee said, "Even if there is good reasons to be a social problem, and if the government and the Ministry of Health and Welfare do not share their perceptions, the economic evaluation will be a small part of the badessment.

The Department of Health and Welfare has pointed out that it would be better to recommend peritoneal dialysis, and it would be necessary to question the situation in which patients do not know and choose the dialysis methods. He should be preceded. Lee says, "Even if it does not become money now, we should do it first." "The strongest force is the voice of the patients, and it should be natural to say," Allow me to To get more services. However, the medical community is concerned that more than 90% of all patients are currently on hemodialysis, and most facilities providing hemodialysis are in the majority. Therefore, it is essential that simultaneous changes such as the patient, the provider, the insurance benefits system are required.

< 저작권자 © 의약뉴스 무단전재 및 재배포금지 >