Pursuit, Yang Seung Tae, Park Byung-Dae secure hard drive … Recovery work rushes



[ad_1]

The prosecution investigates the allegations of "trial transaction" at the time of the Chief Justice of the former Supreme Court Justice Kang Jin-a, who submitted a record hard of the former chief justice of the Supreme Court

According to the prosecution and the court, on January 17, the first special division of the Central District Prosecutor's Office of Seoul is underway. badysis before the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea (the Supreme Court) the day before.

The prosecution started restoring data through an external specialized company to recover its hard drive, which was dismantled by demagnetization (a method to prevent the storage device from being damaged). Be recovered from the hard drive).

In the application process related documents to the court administration last month, check obtained has been controversial.

Amount before the Chief Hard Disk Chief is the last on October 31 at the latest the month of retirement, the hard drive the night before Dean was the Gotta elimination days of retirement last elimination of demagnetization June 1 .

The administrative office of the Court of Cbadation considered that the process of destocking and physical disposal should be conducted in accordance with the applicable rules and procedures. "He said .The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the judge of the Supreme Court rejected the hard drive of the computer because of the nature of the work and were abandoned by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

Currently, The prosecution investigates a case where six people, including judges from the Planning and Coordination Bureau of the Supreme Court of Justice, were involved in a separate area of ​​the Supreme Court, claiming that the disc had been damaged Twelve hard drive duplication jobs are ongoing.

On the other hand, the former president of the Supreme Court ruled that the personal data needed before disposing of the hard drive would be removed. The Supreme Court said that she can not know if the actual backup was done, but the prosecution plans to take steps to secure the backup data from the hard drive.

[email protected]


[ad_2]
Source link