[ad_1]
[Seoul-NewSea] Reporter Lee Hye-won: The court decided to pay the victim to the victims of the company who issued the order of waiting to the employee who was reinstated in the unfair dismissal and made the transfer report to the toilet. In a lawsuit against the company by employee A, the 48th Division of Civil Affairs of the Central District Court of Seoul declared on June 6, "We will pay 25 million won for the victim and will cancel the old layout.
million. A joined the team in June 2015 as a leader of the research team. After six months, the company rejected the research team, saying that Mr. A's performance was poor.
After Mr. A sent a quote request, A responded, "I can not send a quote because I think I will be fired illegally. In fact, the company rejected Mr. A saying that he "spread false information by email and undermined business credit."
Unsurprisingly, Mr. A applied for a redress order from the Labor Committee. The Labor Committee stated: "The degree of discipline of the company was excessive and the disciplinary procedure was also violated."
Society's vengeance continued after Mr. M's reinstatement. A and unpaid wages.
Meanwhile, the company has put in place a working rule for the waiting list, including the use of toilets.
The court saw that the company had unfairly exercised its rights of command and control, undermining the personality of MA
The court ruled that "the Constitution" Every citizen has the dignity and value as that is human, and has the right not to be invaded by privacy and privacy. "" The Constitution imposes the obligation to establish working conditions guaranteeing the dignity of human beings "
" The company told A to write the facts about the books he left his post for a while, including using the restroom. "
The court has stated: "The company has forced him to reveal even the most private area of Mr. A," said the court,
He pointed out that "the accounting instructions lasted three months, and the instructions for such a directive and supervision were not violated. "
" I did not I do not agree with placing Mr. A as a management support officer or being a reasonable man. "Mr. A violated his obligation to protect and protect his obligation under the new ordinance for a long time in the internal network, "he said, invalidating the previous provision and paying additional wages of 5 million won.
ewsis.com
[ad_2]
Source link
