Kris Bryant’s heavy legs, a heavier burden



[ad_1]

When Kris Bryant was taken out last night, it was of course legitimate to question a trade – it’s the season, and it’s rumored a lot – and naturally people did. The HUG WATCH was on, and even David Ross later joked that he wished he could get in touch with the Cubs’ director of media relations to tell him not to say anything so people would continue to panic. “The Rosenthals, the Heymans, all those guys,” Ross said with an evil grin in his post-gamer, “I love that they had to waste time and make phone calls.”

The much more plausible explanation was a matter of injury, of course. All we could hope for was that it wasn’t a serious injury problem, and when the word about the injury was not spoken for a surprisingly long time, I had suspicions: The Cubs were probably very careful how they were going to phrase it. Because of the other thing. You understand.

But I can’t say I expected to see ‘the right hamstrings tiredAs a designation. I’ve been doing this for a long time, and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a team shoot a guy with hamstring “fatigue”. This is a carefully chosen word. It is not a constraint! It is not waterproofing! It’s not even a cramp! It’s just a hamstring that needs a nap, folks. Maybe a piña colada and a miniature umbrella. Nothing to see here.

Just kidding, but I don’t really take it out on the Cubs. The front office, supervisory staff and training staff all know the reality of the situation. There is a luck Bryant will be traded in the coming week, and no one can take unnecessary risks. If Bryant feels the smallest, the smallest – or even just stares at him for a split second – they’re going to shoot him. I wonder what Bryant thinks about it, but I guess he too is an adult and knows the score.

As hoped – and frankly expected after the designation “fatigue” – the description of shooting Bryant was a matter of precaution, no big deal, etc .:

Just heavy legs for a guy who hasn’t had a full All-Star break. Already ready to shoot guys. No need to push. I felt good after the game. I was definitely going to have a night off Wednesday anyway.

Everything maybe / probably true! But also a very convenient situation considering everything we know. If you needed more confirmation that, yes, the Cubs are seriously entertaining Kris Bryant’s trade talks, that was it.

Now the questions will be: Does Bryant return to the roster on Thursday? And if so, are interested teams happy that, yes, the Cubs were just extremely cautious given the looming trade deadline? They’ll get all the medical reports and stuff, but I tend to think that if I’m asked to part with a serious prospect package, I want to see Bryant come back on the field for several games, looking carefree and run like a gazelle.

Again, I can’t help but wonder how Bryant, who has been the subject of trade rumors for years but never during the season, is going to handle the next six, seven, eight days. I mean, what if you could tell your organization takes you out of the games with excessive caution? He’s not an idiot. And, like I said, he’s an adult who knows the situation. But how to deal with it on a daily basis? It must be distracting and annoying as hell. I just hope he hasn’t seen those “as good as gone” headlines, and I also hope the front office has been transparent with him. That’s a lot to ask of a guy.

Anyway, for the hamstrings, we’ll see. It’s conceivable that this is more of a problem than the Cubs suggest, but the proof will be in the pudding. If Bryant plays by Thursday, it was indeed only caution and heavy legs. If he gets an “extra day off,” well, it’s either a more serious hamstring problem that the Cubs are desperate to be able to fix in a matter of days … or they’re actively engaged in trade negotiations. to the point where they will no longer take any risk.

In the meantime, I imagine Kris Bryant’s right hamstrings, sunglasses and poolside with his own even smaller hamstrings on a little lounge chair, relaxing away from fatigue.



[ad_2]

Source link