Large study supporting ivermectin, Fox’s latest miracle COVID treatment, just retracted



[ad_1]

Carlson gave Weinstein a more in-depth interview on the July 9 edition of his streaming show Fox Nation, Tucker Carlson today. Weinstein explained during this appearance that he and his wife decided to take ivermectin rather than get the vaccine, calling the drug “a very effective treatment for COVID and also an effective prophylactic” and saying it was ” safer to run the risk of taking ivermectin ”than taking the vaccines. He went on to suggest that vaccines could be the cause of the proliferation of variants and that“ a reasonable society would stockpile ivermectin “as an” emergency plan “.

Ingraham also argued in her program in March that “our FDA has failed us in many ways by not allowing the use of ivermectin,” which she said has been “used worldwide to reduce COVID-related hospitalizations and deaths “. She has repeatedly hosted guests who have touted the drug as an effective treatment for those affected by the coronavirus.

The takeaway for Fox viewers is that it makes no sense to take COVID-19 vaccines because they are ineffective and dangerous, and if something is wrong they can take ivermectin and you will be fine.

The drug deal took a hit Thursday when the Research Square website removed a major preprint study on the efficacy and safety of ivermectin in treating COVID-19, citing “ethical concerns” , as reported by The Guardian. The study, led by Dr Ahmed Elgazzar of Benha University in Egypt and published in November, claimed to be based on a randomized controlled trial and found “a substantial improvement and reduction in the death rate in the groups treated with ivermectin ”by 90%.

Although Research Square did not identify its concerns, The Guardian noted that critics had found that “the introductory section of the document appeared to have been almost entirely plagiarized,” that “at least 79 of the patient records are obvious clones of other files “, and that” the raw data apparently contradicts[ed] the study protocol several times, ”among other errors and data discrepancies.

Deleting the article has serious implications for the ivermectin case, as The Guardian reports:

[ad_2]

Source link