[ad_1]
Getty Images
The Giants have provided many legitimate reasons to criticize their current alignment strategy, even if they have one. However, a recent report about rookie quarterback Daniel Jones has the feeling that someone is squeezing on the team and the player.
According to the story, the report that someone wanted Jones to be a close end obviously came from a team and not from Jones's camp, because the explanation was that the team did not believe not that Jones was good enough to play the quarter. It is so tempting and almost caricatural that it is very tempting to conclude that another franchise (perhaps the one that plays in New Jersey) wants to make the Giants look even harder to have it. makes him not only a first-round pick, but also the sixth. global choice.
The lie that characterizes the pre-draft process certainly lasts after the end of the draft, as the teams try to create all kinds of false impressions about the guys they recruited ("We wanted it all the time!") And the guys they do not have ("We never wanted him!"). Would a team interested in Daniel Jones as a quarterback now admit it? And, more importantly for these purposes, why does a team that does not want to make things even harder for the Giants and Jones try to make the Giants and Jones look worse instead of improving?
This is not a blow to the report, per se. The report was not made. But the information shared with the reporter may have been. If it is not manufactured, then possibly exaggerated or embellished.
In any event, for the same reason that preliminary reports of their interest or absence are inherently unreliable, subsequent reports of interest or lack thereof are also. Or, at a minimum, they must be considered through the basic prism that: (1) the incentive to prevarication is strong; and (2) the cost of doing so is low.
[ad_2]
Source link