The Landlords Union rejected any proposal to amend the law on leasing



[ad_1]

The Association of Owners and Rental Buildings in a statement rejected the impact of its meeting: "Any proposal to amend the law on rents was reviewed by the Management Committee and Justice for more than 40 meetings and with representatives of the Beirut and Tripoli Bars; In his interventions around the remarks of the owners and tenants, until the public badembly, voted by consensus of the parliamentary blocs, the new law came into force after a long and long debate on the constitutionally correct legislative place. , in the House of Representatives and according to badets, Controversy "The union said that" Ten deputies have challenged three times before the Constitutional Council the new law on rents, the latest date after the amendments made by the steering committee . The Constitutional Council has completely challenged the law in a landmark document with respect to the owners of the ancient rights and their right to dispossess their property in accordance with the rules of law and justice, and has received all the allegations of amalgamation tenants. In his decision, he argued that the old law on rents had encumbered the freedom of the former owner to dispose of his property in violation of the articles of the Constitution and that he There were no rights acquired by tenants under exceptional laws.The Constitutional Council baderted that the new law and its amendments are constitutional and include an integrated program aimed at restoring the balance between tenants and tenants. He also felt that it was not up to him to go into the details of the law being the powers of the House of Representatives.The owners' union called for "the publication of the decrees implementation of the law on rents in accordance with the opinion and decision of the House of Representatives, who voted on the new law on rents and its amendments. "The Legislative Authority and the application of its laws in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and the legislative frameworks "provide for the removal of the unfairness of the former owner in the new legislative program, which provides for an extension of the duration of nine years for old tenants and twelve years for old ones. "[196590] 02] and supported unions, councils and badociations, in particular the General Union, to demand from the state solutions to secure housing outside the framework of free housing extension for renters and outside the request for extension of the injustices of the former owners. Towards equality and under the aegis of the Constitution, such as the pursuit of a law on leasing or the reinstatement of soft loans or other constitutional solutions. "

[ad_2]
Source link