[ad_1]
The post-Mueller press has been so overwhelmed with indictment talks – referred by Donald Trump of a "dirty, dirty and disgusting word" – that it would be easy to assume that a wave background is being built.
"Mueller's remarks urge the removal of fuel," the banner told the Washington Post yesterday.
And it is true that more and more Democratic presidential candidates have been indicted since the appearance of Mueller. Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand and Beto O. Rourke are among those contenders – who naturally benefit from significant media coverage. polls. Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders are among the pillars.
But here's a reality check: none of them will vote on it. And as Nancy Pelosi has pointed out, the number of Democratic House Democrats who advocate for impeachment is more than 40, mostly from the party's left. But there are 235 Democrats in the room.
BARR SAYS THAT IT SEEMS PERSONALLY MELLERIE COULD HAVE REACHED THE DECISION ON OBSTRUCTION
So, despite all the headlines and all the cable discussions, a distinct minority of the Pelosi base actually wants to start an impeachment procedure. And Pelosi holds the line very firmly.
The indictment will not occur without the approval of the president. And she knows that Democrats are more likely to oust Trump at the polls next year than to engage in a ruthless campaign that would fail in the Senate.
As a story, however, the possibility of an indictment is much more tempting than the mundane reality that this probably will not happen.
It is probably fair to say that Mueller's terse performance has increased pressure on Pelosi, but the California congressman is not easily let go.
SIGN UP FOR THE PODCAST BUZZMETER MEDIA MEDIA, A RIFF OF THE MOST HISTORIC DAYS
Given all the polarization around the Mueller probe, it is hardly surprising that commentators came to conclusions so different from his lawyer's remarks, which essentially repeated the contents of the 448-page report.
As the New York Times said, "Here's what President Trump has heard:" The case is over. "Here's what the president's opponents have heard say:" It's time to dismiss " . "
MUELLER DOES NOT WANT TO TESTIFY, BUT WILL HE SUCCESS TO GO OUT OF SUBPOENA?
Conservative experts have taken the opportunity to renew their longstanding attacks on Mueller (just like the president), even though he says he does not want to testify.
The liberal experts seized on his comment, saying that he did not believe he could accuse a sitting president, but that "the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a president in place of 39, reprehensible act ". You see, they say, he practically begs the House to charge! But Mueller was just quoting an old DOJ memo.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Still, there were voices yesterday saying that it would be good for Mueller to go up the hill to recite the report, if only because it would provide a visual that we badly needed.
"As a person who read the report," said Rachel Maddow, "I still find it helpful to have the guy who wrote it down there saying, hey, you know, here's what I'm saying. It is written. "
But if that is the case, given that Mueller speaks with slow and cautious legal jargon, would not it be better for Robert DeNiro to read it instead?
[ad_2]
Source link