Mick Mulvaney on the Trump campaign contacts with the Russians: "The issue is not whether it's ethical"



[ad_1]

Mulvaney's comment followed statements by House of Representatives Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff last week about the ethics surrounding the contacts Trump's team had with officials. individuals offering dirt to Russians. On Thursday, Schiff said: "I do not think it's OK, I think it's immoral, I think it's immoral, I think it's unpatriotic, and yes, I think it's corrupt and a proof of collusion. "

"Again, the problem is not whether it's moral or not," Mulvaney told Jake Tapper, of CNN, about "the state of the Union" , adding that he thought "voters will decide the ethics and morals of the people they vote for." . "

Republican fury directed against Schiff, face of the investigation on Russia

"People liked (former president) Bill Clinton, even though they might not have thought it was as ethical," Mulvaney said. "This is not the work of the House Intelligence Committee, it is not the work of the Judiciary Committee of the House, it is not the work of the Oversight Committee of the House. bedroom."

"They're supposed to look at how the government works, voters make decisions about candidates elsewhere, and, importantly, members of Congress, even if they're the House's intelligence committee chair, do not have to substitute their judgment for the electors ".

The investigation of the special council Robert Mueller on the interference of Russia in the election has not established that the campaign of Trump or his associates were conspiring with Russia, according to the summary of the report presented to Congress by Attorney General William Barr in Congress last week. Mueller's investigation into whether the president had obstructed the court did not find that the president had committed a crime, but she "does not exonerate her either," Barr wrote, citing Mueller's report.

Mueller has not made the decision himself to sue the president for obstruction. Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein determined that the evidence "was not sufficient" to warrant prosecution.

[ad_2]

Source link