[ad_1]
Scams are infesting the internet every day, supplements that can heal all there is to magic weight loss tea, but you are not doing the NASA scam. You do not do it.
For 20 years, Sapa Profiles Inc. (SPI) has convinced NASA that its rocket fairings were certified until, according to the space agency, it provides them with a defective product that would have sabotaged the Taurus XL rocket ( carrying his Orbiting Carbon). Observatory) and Glory Scientific Satellite – $ 700 million worth of failed missions. NASA finally asked Sapa $ 46 million for rockets that could not even go into orbit. Everything is detailed in a recent survey report published by the agency.
"The Taurus T8 mission failed because the payload fairing did not separate during the climb, which prevented the rocket from losing weight," NASA said in a statement. release regarding defective rockets. "Because of its extra weight, the Taurus rocket failed to reach orbital speed, which resulted in a total loss of mission."
The same thing happened with Glory. SPI supplied the aluminum extrusions connecting the fairing halves, the nose cone to protect the payload, whose joints were to be designed to separate and release the payload into space. This obviously did not happen.
After investigating suspicious failures by mission investigation teams that had just taken off, NASA's launch service program (LSP) initiated a technical investigation of parts that could recover rockets. dead.
They found that the seals intended to separate the two parts of the fairing could not compete with the SPI certifications. As if this evidence was not sufficient, NASA's Inspector General Office sent an alert to the LSP, saying that SPI may have changed the test results to make them look legitimate.
You know things get serious when they get to the Department of Justice. That did.
NASA observed that three factors had led to the failure: the thermal contraction of the load carrier and the thickness of the extrusion ligament, two indirect causes, and insufficient properties of the extrusion material, which it was determined that they were the direct cause. Charge carriers are expected to project explosive energy through the ligament of extrusion, and the ligaments themselves were in the upper part of the specification. Both defects were preparing things for disaster.
According to NASA, what really exposed SPI is "an extrusion that does not meet the property specifications of Orbital materials", "a sufficient condition to be the only cause of an incomplete fracture". This supposedly certified part was missed when it was tested by the space agency.
SPI is now facing this 46 million dollar fine, which proves that you are not playing with NASA.
[ad_2]
Source link