[ad_1]
Some organizations have become very reluctant with personal data. It now seems that the General Data Protection Regulation (GVPA) has been in force for more than a month.
The new law should give users more control and protection over what happens to personal data. But because the rules are complex and broad to interpret, they cause anxiety for organizations (especially the smaller ones). The threat of fines of up to 20 million euros does not help.
Strict Practice
Due to lack of data, for example, the Rathenau Institute can not account for the nominations of female professors. This year, the data on career development scientists do not come from the Association of Universities, despite the fact that the information is anonymous. Some universities do not want to give them "because of the new law on privacy."
The institute calculates each year how many years after their doctorate, women and men are appointed as professors on average. The survey last year showed that women become teachers on average two years younger than men, but remain in office for two years.
"We all know that AVG is not intended to make these types of analyzes and research impossible," says Jos de Jonge who does this research for the Rathenau Institute. "You might find someone in the databases." A woman in a science subject with few other teachers, for example. The Rathenau researchers can see this as possible, but in the publication itself which can not be verified.
The Association of Universities does not want to announce which universities are involved, but the umbrella organization understands the fear. "You notice that there is a great deal of uncertainty among organizations about what they do and do not share," the spokesman said. "The new law is complicated and we still do not know which texts are only guiding, and which also become strict practice."
See also: Save "just in case" fines
Bioindustrial Firms
The Party for Animals did not also failed to seek information from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs about a trade mission. Employees often look for bio-industry companies that go with the government, this time to visit the livestock sector in Turkey. The party was informed that mission participants had to first request a "no objection" statement because of the privacy law – and many participants had objections upon request.
This precaution also applies to small organizations. Michiel Steltman asked the dentist of his hometown, Leimuiden, where he could receive email photos of his jaw. In this way, his other half with knowledge in dentistry could look. But the dentist said that the new law on privacy forbade him to send his data by e-mail. Steltman has indeed never received the photographs, that of his own jaw.
Read also: It Happens When You Ask for Your Data
Prayer
In the Grote Kerk of Gorinchem, More Prayers Are Made for the Sick in the service without their permission. "If someone asks, for example, to pray for his sick mother, we will not ask permission from the patient," says Kees Struik. As far as it is concerned, it is exaggerated. "Evil and good are cut off from such a law."
"We are completely and completely here and there," says Menno Weij, a technology lawyer. According to Weij, there are a number of problems that explain the above. First and foremost, the majority of privacy rules have not changed at all, but because of the threat of fines, organizations are now freaking out late maintenance.
But there is also a lot of uncertainty about the new law. Jurisprudence lacks: how much is the soup really consumed? The supervisory authority for privacy for personal data also gives little clarity.
For example, reasonable retention periods must be used for the data, but what is reasonable? Many organizations also believe that they can only process the data with the consent of the consumer, while there may also be a legitimate interest, although it may be legally complicated. "The result is that organizations are asking everyone for permission," says Weij.
[ad_2]
Source link
