[ad_1]
Obama. By the way, men spoke more often than men about women on radio (7,849 times compared to 1,723), men were more often talked about than women on the radio, famous or influential people who received names of celebrities. via Internet. (such as those in the first paragraph of this article) were also more likely to mention them simply by the family name if they were men, and as the subjects found them more influential. In almost 4,500 comments on the Rate my Professors website, where American students judge their teachers, male teachers were, for example, in only 40% of cases mentioned by their last name and teachers in 25% of cases (without first name) prof., dr., sir or madam) In another experiment, subjects recruited on the Internet had to describe dry information about a fictional scientist in a current story: "Douglas Berson" called " Berson 'more than four times:' Dolores Berson '. By men and women. And in 336 excerpts from five different and politically diverse US radio broadcasts in 2014 and 2015, journalists and experts returned more than twice as often to men as to women with only last name. In famous women, such a family name seems less common. Einstein. Curia? The latter obviously can not be translated bi-one into reality: in science, researchers are judged by each other, not by interested parties of the general public. Hemingway. And this difference could well contribute to gender inequality in high-level disciplines such as science, politics, and art. But Woolf? It works as a status enhancer. Evaluating My Teachers Psychologists have done a series of tests in which the difference in the way men and women are spoken has become clear. Other subjects who could read a fictional research proposal via the Internet, rated the researcher mentioned in the last name as being better known and better than the researcher whose name (gender neutral) was mentioned. Albright? Not necessarily on purpose: high-status professions are traditionally dominated by men, so people probably find it more or less consciously or unconsciously to make it clear when it comes to an unexpected woman. These men do not need a name or an introduction for the general public. But psychologists show that men practice more often than women only by the surname than men more often on a pedestal instead. The difference remained significant after all references to Hillary Clinton were removed from the data; she used her name herself in her campaign, also to distinguish herself from her husband Bill. A researcher who is only mentioned by surname would also deserve more awards, depending on the test subjects. The latter works in two directions, showed the Cornell psychologists. It's a systematic difference in the way we talk about men and women, the psychologists at Cornell University show in an article in PNAS (June 26). Because if someone refers only to the family name, people are inclined to think that the person will therefore be famous and important.
Source link
