[ad_1]
Suspects without a fixed address may have to give up DNA in the future if they are secure. This only happens when they have been convicted, but the Minister Ferd Grapperhaus of Justice will see if it is possible. It does so at the request of the House of Representatives, who was shocked by the large number of convicts whose DNA sample is still missing.
Whoever commits a crime often does not leave it immediately. By taking the authors' DNA, other offenses can therefore be resolved regularly. But it is far from possible, as the law requires, to take a sample of all convicted for serious crimes. Convicts prefer to avoid it and succeed because they are often only called when they are already at liberty. Then the police will lose sight of them, and they often lack the manpower to find them. The lion's share of this group has no fixed place of residence.
Grapperhaus reiterates that the decrease in DNA in people who have not yet been convicted is soon in contradiction with human rights. Before he thinks of a change in legislation for this purpose, he wants to see first if he can do without it. In anticipation of this assessment, which should be completed next spring, he will investigate how he could take DNA from suspects without a permanent address. If it turns out to be necessary and possible, he will be able to make headlines with headlines this spring.
The minister admitted earlier this month that the backlog of the DNA database has only gone up. This, while his department had promised a better right after previous disturbing reports. According to Nieuwsuur, there are now 21,000 convicts.
[ad_2]
Source link
