[ad_1]
The new municipality of Groningen initially obtains a deputy mayor
Tuesday evening, a majority of the Senate (49 votes for, 25 against) supported the colleagues of the House of Representatives, which in April has already approved the draft Act The Merge
Debate
The call marked the end of a debate on twelve proposals for reclassification, including that of Haren. The debate began Monday night with contributions and questions from the various factions of the Senate. Tuesday night followed the response of Minister Kajsa Ollongren (D66, Home Affairs) and the vote
Senate debates: Haren merger seems inevitable
Read more
Now that the Senate is in agreement, there is no way back The Minister and King Willem-Alexander will sign and so the law is in force.
Found Too Light
Minister Ollongren expressed doubts as to whether an independent Haren can weigh enough in the future and if that may mean enough for residents now that municipalities are facing tasks more and more complex.
She repeatedly pointed out that the vulnerability to Haren's financial and administrative position underlies the merger decision. "This vulnerability has existed for a long time, and a reason for supporting the reclassification of the province."
Secret Agreements
The Minister also raised the idea that there would be secret agreements between the state and the province to push for a reclassification rich in fables
"From the inside there have been regular contacts with the province and also with the municipalities. As it is common. It is also important to achieve a good balance. These contacts must always be open. The trajectory has been carefully conducted.
Ruhry's Story
Voting results put an end to a heated debate over several years on the administrative future of Haren, marked by political unrest, administrative disagreements, and coalition and political changes. 39; opposition. revision: already in 2013 the board of the then (with a coalition of VVD, PvdA, GroenLinks and ChristenUnie) makes a provisional decision of reassignment. Only the fractions of the CDA and Gezond Verstand Haren are disappointing
A year later, the cards were reworked again after a consultative referendum showed that a large majority of Hareners were in the same category. opposed a reclassification.
Timeline: How Haren turns last sob resisted reclassification
Read More
Price Change
The elections that take place in April 2014 have placed the opposition group of GVH in the coalition. Mariska Sloot will become alderman in the new college of GVH, VVD and D66
Council position plummets: it is no longer for but against the merger and entrusts to the commission the mission to study the feasibility of An independent future. [19659002] The change of course is why alderman Paula Lambeck (VVD) leaves college. CDA takes the place of VVD
Growing discontent over the situation and the wish of the Province, which Haren wants to add to Groningen and Ten Boer, led in December 2017 to the resignation of Mariska Sloot.
The course continues with two other aldermen: Michiel Verbeek (D66) and Mathilde Stiekema (D66). Mariska Sloot refers them to the council, which continues to fight for an independent future for the municipality.
In early 2017, the province will advise the Interior Minister to reclassify, after which, in April 2018, a majority in the lower house will agree. with the bill
Reorganization from Below
The basic principle of the Cabinet is that reclassifications are preferably done from the bottom up. With the support of the people and the council. In principle, municipalities make their own reclassification decisions.
Opponents of the reorganization criticize the approach of the minister and the province, who advise against Haren independent and advise the minister to add Haren to Groningen and Ten Boer. While in 2014, in a consultative referendum with a 75.5% turnout, three-quarters of voters voted against a merger.
In special cases, a "top-down" reclassification can be implemented, for example as an administrative authority a municipality is so weakened that it is no longer able to conduct to complete his own tasks.
Proponents of the reorganization therefore argue, in the case of Haren, that there is indeed too little administrative power and a financial situation too risky. Declarations which, according to the opponents, are actually false.
They maintain that although the municipality is still paying debts, the reserves are increasing. In addition, Haren is in the top of the best municipalities in the Netherlands for years. This would not happen if it was not good with the administrative power, they argue.
[ad_2]
Source link
