The inspection was aware of the withdrawal of the official Stint report

The temporary stay ban is in part based on the official report of an employee of an Amsterdam nursery who was subsequently removed. One day before the withdrawal of the electric wagon, the woman tried to inform the Environmental and Transportation Inspectorate (ILT) of the inaccuracy of this official report. Nevertheless, the report of the Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, which includes the ILT, on the maternal assistant was cited as one of the main reasons for the ## 147 ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 39, prohibition of the electric wagon. Infrastructure and Public Works, VVD) and a document of the Attorney General in the hands of RTL Nieuws .

Accident

The OM document shows that on September 20, the day of Stint's accident at Oss, where four children died, the daycare staff recorded an official report with the police. According to the report she wrote, RTL would have had problems with the relay brakes that she was using for her work. According to the Attorney General, she is then unhappy with the way "the LTI used her statement". That's why she called the LTI on September 30 and contacted the police on October 1. She informed the two authorities that she wished to withdraw the statement and that she was having trouble reading the ILT

Read also: The manufacturer Stint Announces Bankruptcy

However , his statement is cited among the main reasons for suspension of the admission of Stint on public roads announced by the Minister of Nieuwenhuizen on October 1. The question was to what extent the department, to which the TIL belongs, was aware of the withdrawal of the statement that day. Neither the ministry nor the LTI later commented on the withdrawn statement, which was part of their decision to ban the relay. OM is conducting its own criminal investigation into the incident.

Last Saturday, the Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment even told RTL that it was "not known" with a complementary statement. In his letter to Parliament, Nieuwenhuizen said he had heard of the existence of the statement withdrawn on Wednesday. She also mentions in the letter that ILT, which is therefore her responsibility, had already been aware of it on 30 September. We do not know how it is possible for the minister to not know all this time.

Thursday evening, from 6 pm to 10 pm, the House speaks with the Minister. Opposition deputies on the left are very critical of how Van Nieuwenhuizen justified his suspension decision and informed the House.