[ad_1]
Before the weekend, EU leaders reached a compromise in the troubled battle over where refugees should be taken away.
Godal responded by posting on Facebook the expectation that Ap leaders would follow:
Macron won in the EU; reception in Europe! We must take our share. Humanitarian responsibility in the spirit of Nansen! Amundsen and FrP are against it. We must support the cautious positive signals of UD, Ines, Erna. No need to wait for Masud and the recommendation of the migration committee!
Masud is Masud Gharakani, leader of the party's Migration Committee, and controversial because of a series of statements and rhetoric that many of the parters believe belong to Frp.
– Good for Norway to give a signal
– The EU has taken a decision of principle. There is still a lot of work and it is a difficult European discussion. It is good that Norway gives a signal of our position and that we do not belong to those countries that do not want to do anything, "says Godal.
This eventually broke a feud between Frp and the US. one side and the right on the other hand.And on the other side of the Norwegian position, Godal considers that it is necessary that the Ap signal where is the party
– Prime Minister gave a positive signal .. Left the same thing Frp says that Norway is not the place of the EU housekeeper and an underutilization of the EU.Then it is necessary that the Ap take a stand and take its responsibilities as a European nation, "says Godal.
In another post, Godal's impatience also reveals itself:
The Left is on the path to Progress Party. I'm sure KrF is with. Only A. There is enough he writes.
– Natural that Ap chooses the page
– Do you need a clear answer from the leader of the Ap Jonas Gahr Støre?
– This is the debate now. He is close to support the prime minister. I say what Ap should do in this situation
– You mean that it must be done now and not after the holidays?
– I think it's natural when Frp is debating it now. It is natural that Ap choose a page and that it is not Frp, but the Prime Minister's signals should be supported, he says.
The unanimous agreement is that EU countries should jointly take care of refugees and migrants picked up in the Mediterranean. and landed on the European side.
Prime Minister Erna Solberg said that Norway should contribute to the distribution of refugees between European countries. Frp is not in agreement.
Read also: AP profile profiles against party leadership
Frp: Norway is not the EU guardhouse [19659006] – Norway should not accept the so-called refugees from the EU. Norway is not the place of the housekeeper of the EU. We are not a member of the EU and we should not be. This is a view like a lot in FRP shares. And it is important that we clearly express, "said Per-Willy Amundsen at the NRK
He thinks that Norway can not accept refugees and migrants as long as the EU countries are free to say no
– is a voluntary scheme that the EU has accepted.Several EU countries will thank no, including Poland, Hungary and others.There are therefore no reason for Norway, which is not a member of the EU, not to do so, "said Amundsen, who will set up arrival centers in North Africa. 19659002] Guri Melby, a left-wing immigration politician, told the NRK that "the view from the left is that Norway must participate in international cooperation to face the challenges of migrants. Agreements across national borders are good for solving the common challenge. "
At the same time, he goes out and talks in social media about the various issues of Aps.
Anne Holt, former minister of the council, thinks it's" bad to watch " :
It is said that reefs, wolves and other animals that walk in the hut can rub their leg to be free.It may be a myth, but it's a thought so much beautiful and brutal: the raw instinct of survival.The working group currently seems to be doing something much more absurd.They rub their legs to die.Back looking old friends, Holt writes on Facebook.
"And nobody seems to see and recognize that the worst predators must be isolated!", Replies former high-gradist Gro Balas.
[ad_2]
Source link
