Trumps' division and war underestimate Europe pretty much



[ad_1]

Last year's NATO summit was sometimes called a "disaster" after the hard drive of the US president. Will it be more reconciled this time, or will the NATO summits still meet the Donald Trump bulldozer?

Already Monday afternoon, Trump has published reports on Twitter criticized by other NATO countries for not contributing enough to the alliance. In a known style, the US President reiterated that the United States spent more money for NATO than any other member state. Trump also wrote that Europe needs much more defense alliance than the United States.

Disagreement within the NATO Alliance is not new. However, the President of the United States repeatedly expresses his reluctance towards the Alliance in general and makes it clear that he does not like certain key people, like German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the prime minister Theresa May and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. After a glimpse of a possible mutual sympathy between Trump and Frenchman Emanuel Macron, it is now clear that this friendship has also cooled considerably.

However, Trump does not hesitate for a moment to express his admiration for Russian President Vladimir Putin's life of Xi Jinping and Trump's last friend, "Supreme Leader" of North Korea since 2011, Kim Jong- a.

Trump is on the right track to make friends to their enemies; and his worst enemies to his best friends

It might be smarter to trust his friends before embarking on a dangerous transfer to foreign countries.

Meeting Marathon

The order and meaning of Trump meetings expected This week, little random:

  • NATO Summit in Brussels on July 10 and 11
  • Official visit to the Kingdom July 12 and 13
  • Summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki on July 16

Here he has set up a series of meetings where the "new sheriff of the city" can really say who are his friends and who is not. His "shared military policy" seemed alien in a major political context

Reason for the visit of US President Barack Obama to London in April 2016. Scanpix / AP

Reason for the visit of US President Barack Obama in London in April 2016. Scanpix / AP.

Trump's high level of activity and his admiration for Putin must be viewed in conjunction with Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential elections, where Trump defeated Hillary Clinton. The involvement of a stranger in one of the holiest institutions of the United States, the choice of the country's president, is of course totally unsustainable. President Obama immediately elected 35 Russian diplomats from the United States and closed some of the biggest spies in the Washington area.

Up to now, there is no indication that Trump himself or his closest staff illegally contributed to the Russian election.

Researcher Robert Mueller is still in full swing with his investigation into the possible interaction between Russia and Trump's election campaign. Stock Photo 2017: Scanpix / Reuters.

Researcher specialist Robert Mueller is still in full swing with his investigation into the possible interaction between Russia and the Trump election campaign. Archives 2017: Scanpix / Reuters.

But the investigation is still going on under the auspices of Attorney General Robert Mueller, to find out if Trump or his people did anything that violates US law.

See also:

Trump plans to leave the WTO

Customs disputes and insults

There are reasons to worry that Trump at the Summit of the NATO in Brussels on July 11 and 12 will find a new, useless performance as it did at the Quebec City meeting in Canada in the so-called "Group of 7" last month. The G7 countries are a group of rich, democratic, industrialized countries that cooperate. The group includes Canada, France, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States. Until four years ago, when Russia annexed neighboring Ukraine, Russia also participated. The European Union The EU is also represented at G7 meetings, and at this year's meeting, Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg was invited to attend part of the meeting.

Shortly before the G7 meeting in Quebec the introduction of new tariffs and taxes on exports of steel and aluminum to the United States, which was very negative for US trading partners. In Quebec, Trump arrived late at the start of the meeting, insisting that Russia be reinstated to the G-7, threatening to sharpen the trade war against the US's traditional trading partners, and refused to sign a joint statement. After the meeting, he called the meeting's host, Prime Minister Trudeau, for "very dishonest and weak."

A Frequently Rewritten Reason for the G7 Meeting in Canada June 9th. German Chancellor Angela Merkel looks at the table. US President Donald Trump seated right. US National Security Advisor John Bolton and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in the background. Scanpix / Reuters. Photo: Handout. / Reuters

Reason frequently given at the G7 meeting in Canada, June 9. German Chancellor Angela Merkel looks at the table. US President Donald Trump seated right. US National Security Advisor John Bolton and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in the background. Scanpix / Reuters. Photo: Handout. Reuters

Attacking "free passengers"

Trump at the NATO summit is strained over the next few days to show the same negative attitude of the US military military partners that he made in Quebec at his traditional trading partners. Trump made it clear that he believes that NATO partners pay little for the military community, for which partner countries have long sought to devote at least two percent of their gross national product (GDP) to defense. He led criticism against Germany, accusing the country of acting as a free passenger to NATO.

Germany currently uses 1.2% of its GDP in defense and the Germans do not plan to reach the two percent first. This causes Trump. According to NTB, a snapshot of last winter shows that only 15 of the 29 Member States are achieving the 2% target by 2024.

Countries that pay too little will be " treaties, "warned Trump. There is also a warning to Norway, which currently uses 1.6% of GDP for defense purposes.

And Trump later said that he believes that neither two percent is not enough, but that it should be

Following the NATO meeting of 11 and June 12 in Brussels, Trump goes to Britain, where military cooperation between the Allied countries originated during the Second World War. NATO became the victorious part of the Cold War, which ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

Following the plan, President Trump will meet with Queen Elizabeth and Premier Theresa May. He will also visit the birthplace of Winston Churchill, Blenheim Palace, in the village of Woodstock, 13 km northwest of Oxford. On Fridays, he goes to Scotland. From there, he will travel to Helsinki on Monday, July 16th to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin

To read also: Stoltenberg about Trump: – I have a good working relationship with him

hard

With a full-fledged trade war, it's not unthinkable that Trump at the NATO meeting is fighting hard against the issue of NATO members who spend money for their military defense. Norway may be particularly vulnerable, as it is known all over the world that Norway has derived enormous oil revenue from the North Sea and that it is now considered to be the largest in the world. 39, one of the richest countries in the world.

Political decisions are made at the White House.

With former CIA chief, Mike Pompeo, Foreign Minister and former UN Ambassador, John Bolton, Security Policy Advisor, Balancing Between Moderate and Extreme Voices in the Presence of the President have changed considerably in favor of the extreme

Will the less wealthy countries have to withdraw from NATO because they can not spend two or four percent of GDP to defense? Or could the United States significantly reduce their participation in NATO? This could become one of the most serious crises in the history of NATO for 70 years

See also: EU: – Donald Trump is dangerous for the & # 39; Europe

Putin has everything to gain in the crisis [19659043] Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Trump meet in Helsinki next Monday. Here are the two in conversation at the G20 meeting in Germany last summer. Scanpix / Reuters

Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Trump meet in Helsinki next Monday. Here are the two in conversation at the G20 meeting in Germany last summer. Scanpix / Reuters

Finally in this major political series, Trump will meet Putin in Helsinki. Who has the most to do with a possible crisis of cooperation between Western countries – both economically and militarily – and especially to NATO? Vladimir Putin, of course. And Trump would have shown how powerful and important he was – and how important Trump and Putin would be – if they worked together.

There are also other important uncertainties in international politics today. How will Europe evolve when the UK leaves the EU and will it be able to conclude new bilateral agreements? If the leader of the Labor Party, Jeremy Corbyn, became British Prime Minister, how would he look at NATO – or new relations between the United States, Russia and the United Kingdom? Trump broke Western cooperation over the nuclear deal with Iran, controlling at least to some extent the development of nuclear weapons in Iran. What would that mean for the balance of power in the Middle East?
And according to a recent Bloomberg comment by former US Navy admiral James Stravridis, Trump will hear in a recent debate that Sweden is not a member of NATO. . So Trump should have noticed that it might not have been so stupid if the United States could get the same kind of agreement as Sweden, according to him, that the Americans could "choose and destroy the military operations in which they would like to participate ".

The NATO Pact may be more vulnerable than President Trump believes.

At the heart of the military cooperation agreement, the requirement to consider an attack against one of the member states constitutes an attack on all. This assumes that other NATO countries have also participated in the war on international terrorism following the terrorist attacks on targets in New York and Washington on September 11, 2001. President Trump's reluctance towards Western countries weakens the promise of the NATO Pact. This contradicts Trump's attitude that small countries should be as important and have the same rights as big countries in cooperation.

At the same time, the world is changing. Russia is not as powerful as the Soviet Union, while the importance of ensuring the existence of small democracies also increases, as authoritarian influences are affecting country development more and more numerous – like Poland and Hungary – not to mention Turkey. ] Serious doubts about the gravity of the United States

The more Trump will go against the traditional co-operative countries in Europe, the more the European countries will doubt the seriousness of the United States in the obligations that underlie the agreements cooperation with the United States. has an interesting conclusion about his article recently on the problems of the Western Alliance:

President Trump thinks he's a master in the art of negotiation. But on the path of strengthening America, it seriously underestimates the importance of the unity it seems to want to weaken in Europe.

See also:

– Bureaucrats must write together Trump River documents in pieces

What is it? Trump does well?

Estimate: Trump will make the United States a "country in their image"

[ad_2]
Source link

Tags