[ad_1]
The Ministry of Women and Vulnerable Populations (MIMP) has asked the Congressional Ethics Committee to respect the privacy rights of the Latam Airlines crew member who denounced the parliamentarian. Moisés Mamani (Fuerza Popular) for allegedly touching.
It should be noted that this commission cited for this Wednesday – at a regular session scheduled for 15:00 – for the cabin crew so that he can resume his demonstration.
The Ministry of Women recalled that the victim of alleged illegal contacts had already handed over his demonstration to the police station of the international airport Jorge Chávez, which could be requested in connection with the investigations of the commission. ethics.
The congressman Richard Arce (New Peru) endorsed the position of the Ministry of Women, stating that the information provided in the complaint was sufficient.
"I share the inconvenience because it's a very complicated situation, that the complaint has already been filed by the flight attendant that was attacked," he told RPP.
He recalled that the complaint also relied on other testimonies provided by eyewitnesses to the alleged crime, which could also be cited to corroborate the allegations.
It should be noted that the Ethics Commission is also cited as a director of Inca Manco Capac International Airport in Juliaca (Puno) and persons who were in the aircraft where the events would have occurred .
"With that, they already have enough elements to do an analysis because this exposure will generate a sudden exposure for the second time," he added. Richard Arce.
Moisés Mamani On November 14, he was charged with touching a member of the Latam Airlines crew, which resulted in him being disembarked on a flight to Lima.
Faced with this complaint, the Public Prosecutor's Office yesterday asked the Callao preparatory inquiry court to lift the parliamentary immunity of the Moisés Mamani to treat it formally.
The Fuerza Popular Discipline Committee also quoted Congressman for Wednesday Moisés Mamani in order to
exercise his right of defense before the aforementioned complaint.
Source link
