Are the guidelines for chronic disease surveillance in primary care evidence-based?



[ad_1]

Pathology tests have a unique place in the management of chronic diseases. They are used to guide the management of the disease; assess risks and compliance; and enable the early detection of adverse events, complications and the development of secondary diseases. Primary care clinicians use guidelines for common chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension to know what tests to recommend to patients and how often. With pathology test rates rising, with an estimated annual cost of £ 1.8 billion for primary care in the UK1– and the potential for harm caused by over-testing, it is important to consider the evidence base for these recommendations.

In this article, we review the UK's current guideline surveillance strategies for patients with type 2 diabetes, chronic renal failure, and hypertension (Box 1), highlighting the uncertainties of these recommendations and the need for further research.

Case 1

Research Strategy and Selection of Guidelines

We sought guidelines published in the UK for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes, chronic renal failure at stages 1 to 3 * or hypertension using the following sources:

  • National Institute for the Excellence of Health and Care (NICE)

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)

  • Royal Colleges of Pathologists (RCPath), Physicians and GPs

  • Quality Results Framework (QOF)

The following guidelines are included in this review:

  • SIGN 116 Diabetes Management (2017)2

  • NICE CG127 Hypertension, clinical management of primary hypertension in adults (2011)3

  • NICE …

RETURN TO TEXT

[ad_2]
Source link