[ad_1]
D Deschamps, still a pragmatist, will not deserve any recognition for aesthetics after France's 1-0 victory over Belgium. The manager has chosen to stack his midfield and use a weak defensive block, but France has been devastatingly effective. This efficiency has always been in this team, but it was up to Deschamps to tap into his considerable resources and find the right balance
Belgium, like Argentina and Uruguay, played in the hands of France for lack of tactical approach. . Roberto Martínez was caught before the tournament for having selected a single back Thomas Meunier, and a suspension at the right back of the PSG has proved costly for Belgium. Martínez's decision to abandon his defense to three for a fourth-back with Jan Vertonghen and Nacer Chadli as side-ends seems more bizarre at every passing moment. His decision to abandon Dries Mertens and play Kevin de Bruyne on the right is a decision that leaves the Manchester City midfielder uneasy against Blaise Matuidi
. with the shortcomings of Martínez, but Deschamps deserves more credit than his counterpart deserves to be blamed. Six years after his arrival as a national coach and after a period of mixed management in the club, Deschamps has indeed created this team in his image. Not only that, but he showed his confidence in putting his ideas into action on the ground, which was missing in France at major tournaments.
Deschamps did not necessarily select the 23 most talented players at his disposal. it would be entirely dedicated to working for each other and for their manager. There were nuances at Euro 2016, but no one would confuse Dimitri Payet's fondness for flair at the expense of playing a full match or the defeatist Patrice Evra or Bacary Sagna for the fierce performances of current side Lucas Hernández and Benjamin Pavard
During the construction of this team, Deschamps did not rely on the glories of the past to fight against Les Bleus (Mamadou Sakho), his own loyalties (Moussa Sissoko) or the fact that a player is at a big club (Anthony Martial and Alexandre Lacazette). It is also a reflection of Deschamps' pragmatism. He based his selection not only on talent but also on how France would work as a team. This is also part of his own evolution. The Deschamps of the past would never have left aside the experience of Sakho, Benzema or Mathieu Debuchy for untested Pavard and Presnel Kimpembe.
He still made a strange tactical misstep, as the use of a collection of Indeed, Olivier Giroud was transferred to the first round against Australia, who left France with serious spacing problems in attack. However, tactics have never been Deschamps' strength, even though he seems to have found a rather ingenious solution with his 4-4-2 / 4-3-3 hybrid.
His strength has been in the management of this team. The electric presence of Kylian Mbappé and the occasional flashes of Pogba and Griezmann certainly played their part in leading France to the final, but what made them known was their cohesion and their obstinacy. This unit finds its origin in Deschamps' insistence on choosing a young, almost untested team at the expense of more established players. Again, excluded players may have more experience, including Karim Benzema, but they would not have been as likely to participate in Deschamps planning in the same manner.