ESA's Planck satellite has found no new evidence of the mysterious cosmic anomalies that appeared on its temperature map of the Universe. The latest study does not rule out the potential relevance of the anomalies, but it does mean that astronomers have to work even harder to understand the origin of these confusing features.
The latest results from Planck come from an analysis of the polarization of cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), the oldest light in cosmic history, issued when the Universe only had 380,000 years.
The initial analysis of the satellite, made public in 2013, is focused on the temperature of this radiation in the sky. This allows astronomers to investigate the origin and evolution of the cosmos. While it largely confirmed the standard picture of the evolution of our universe, Planck's first map also revealed a number of anomalies difficult to explain in the standard cosmological model.
Anomalies are weak features on the sky that appear at large angular scales. These are certainly not artifacts produced by the behavior of the satellite or the processing of the data, but they are sufficiently weak to constitute statistics, fluctuations extremely rare but not totally excluded by the standard model.
Alternatively, the anomalies could be a sign of "new physics", a term used to refer to natural processes still unrecognized that would extend the known laws of physics.
To further investigate the nature of the anomalies, the Planck team examined CMB polarization, which was revealed after careful analysis of multi-frequency data designed to eliminate microwave sources in the foreground, including gases and the dust in our own galaxy way.
This signal is the best measure to date of the CMB polarization E modes, and dates back to the time when the first atoms formed in the Universe and the CMB were released. It is produced in the same way as the light scattered by the electronic particles just before the electrons are collected into hydrogen atoms.
Polarization provides an almost independent view of CMB. Therefore, if the anomalies should also appear, astronomers would be more likely to believe that they could be caused by new physical data rather than by statistics.
Although Planck was not originally designed to focus on polarization, his observations were used to create the most accurate sky charts on CMB polarization to date. These were published in 2018, greatly improving the quality of Planck's first polarization maps, released in 2015.
When Planck's team examined this data, it found no obvious signs of anomalies. At best, the analysis, published today in Astronomy and astrophysics, revealed some weak clues indicating that some of the abnormalities may be present.
"Planck's polarization measurements are fantastic," says Jan Tauber, scientific director of ESA's Planck project.
"Despite the excellent data we have, we do not see any trace of a significant anomaly."
At first glance, this would seem to make the anomalies more likely than statistics, but in reality, this does not rule out a new physics because nature might be more delicate than we do it. think.
For the moment, there is no convincing assumption about the type of new physics that could be the source of the anomalies. Thus, it is possible that the responsible phenomenon only affects the temperature of the CMB, but not the polarization.
From this point of view, although the new analysis does not confirm the existence of a new physics, it imposes significant constraints on it.
The most serious anomaly appearing on the CMB temperature map is a signal deficit observed at large angular scales of the sky, around five degrees – for comparison, the full moon covers about half a degree. At these large scales, Planck's measurements are about ten percent lower than the standard model of cosmology predicts.
Planck also confirmed, with high statistical confidence, other abnormal features to which reference was made in previous CMB temperature observations, such as a significant divergence of the signal observed in the two opposite hemispheres of the sky, and a so-called effect. cold point – a large low temperature spot with an unusually high temperature profile.
"At the time of the first publication, we announced that Planck would test the anomalies using its polarization data.The first series of polarization cards sufficiently clear for this purpose was published in 2018, we now have the results, "says Krzysztof M Górski, one of the authors of the new paper, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Caltech, US.
Unfortunately, the new data did not push the debate further, as the latest results do not confirm or deny the nature of the anomalies.
"We have evidence that in the polarization maps there might be a power asymmetry similar to that observed in the temperature maps, although it remains statistically unconvincing," adds Enrique Martínez González, who is also co-leader. author of the article. , from the Instituto de Física de Cantabria in Santander, Spain.
Although Planck's results are analyzed in greater depth, it is unlikely that they will lead to any new significant results on this subject. The obvious way forward is a dedicated mission specifically designed and optimized to study the polarization of CMB, but this is in at least 10 to 15 years.
"Planck has provided us with the best data we will have for at least a decade," said Anthony Banday, co-author of the Institute for Research in Astrophysics and Planetology, Toulouse, France.
Meanwhile, the mystery of the anomalies persists.
From an almost perfect universe to the best of both worlds
More information:
Indefinite indefinite. Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB, Astronomy and astrophysics (2019). DOI: 10.1051 / 0004-6361 / 201935201
Provided by
ESA
Quote:
Planck finds no new evidence of cosmic anomalies (June 6, 2019)
recovered on June 6, 2019
from https://phys.org/news/2019-06-planck-evidence-cosmic-anomalies.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair use for study or private research purposes, no
part may be reproduced without written permission. Content is provided for information only.