[ad_1]
My only explanation is that Fernando Medina had a teenage passion for Madonna that he has not yet recovered. Maybe if I was responsible for Lisbon and Tom Cruise (even better if I wore the same airman's jacket that I wore in Top Gun), I do not know, to close the Ponte Vinte Cinco of Abril for six months to film any one film mistela of action, was a girl to study the case and do everything to access it.
Fernando Medina could have had her teenage room full of Madonna posters with those corsages that Jean Paul Gaultier designed for concerts and for these. relics that were the video clips. Or, perhaps, gave the first kiss to the sound of "real blue, baby I like you". This is the only benign explanation for what happened to the contract of assignment, above the knee and at the price of the balance, parking near Rua das Janelas Verdes to Madonna. For the other justification that remains is that Fernando Medina to be a sociopath and deliberately torture the people of Lisbon.
But no, it must be a case of passion for decades. In addition to handing over the car parks, did it justify the fact that it was the city officials who were looking for places for Madonna's cars? What the heck, but for what purpose do Portuguese and Portuguese taxpayers seek places for a private (with the resources to pay for these services mainly) have parking? It was the CML officials who contacted the National Museum of Ancient Art, and there they moved, asking the museum to give Madonna parking lots. CML staff went to see the back suggested by the MNAA to see if they would serve the needs of a private resident in this area of Santos. But … but … how?
And speaking of MNAA. The MNAA is in a difficult parking spot. The surrounding streets have a lot of cars and few seats, there is a tiny front in front of one of the ever-crowded entrances of passenger cars. This is not a convenient place to visit, especially with children or people with reduced mobility. There is no parking, no subway (the western part of the city does not), the rides are narrow (and with the damn Portuguese sidewalk). But after all, I know that the CML has a terreiro near the museum, where there are at least fifteen cars, and that he has never remembered to make access to MNAA visitors available. (Who, by the way, needs to earn more money at the box office.) Neither the inhabitants of the area, for the rest.
I will not see myself haranguing tourists, but I would appreciate that central and local governments facilitate the enjoyment of cultural property by the permanent Portuguese inhabitants. Facilitating the journey to an important museum might have been forewarned as a prerequisite for cultural policy. In addition, I live not far from the MNAA, I go there with relative frequency (and annoyance) to see temporary exhibitions. The MNAA has a cafe and a restaurant in the garden overlooking the Tagus, very friendly. If it was easier to travel, this cafe could be better monetized and bring more revenue to the museum, which would make good use of it.
On the other hand, we have a pidesca EMIDE. A lack of atrocious parking in the old neighborhoods of Lisbon, without CML worries to give a solution to the residents. You do not want to know. Medina, with the work of the previous mandate, reduces wherever the number of parking lots has passed. Anyone who wants to legalize a garage is abused by the technical offices (I have experienced such an experience for a decade and a half) as if stealing the public space. Missing car parks are not built.
And in front of all this, Fernando Medina gallantly offers fifteen parking spaces to Madonna. Thinking well after all, that's sociopathy.
Let me make one last jump in the operation Tutti Frutti. There is an investigation, let's wait. (Ui, I even look like a politician to comment.) But while we wait, we can change the legislation to mitigate these, say, temptations. We can start by preventing the accumulation of elective functions by different politicians. Let us be honest, there are not a dozen or two (or ten) wonderful people in Portugal who are needed at the Assembly of the Republic, in the municipal chambers, in the parishes, everywhere. Let's continue with frankness: either they are super-men and super-women (and we all know that they do not exist outside movies and comics, is not it?) Or are lax with different jobs, because they do not spend as much as they owe one of them. And finally, let's face it, even with sincerity: how many additional positions are accumulated, more power links are established, more budgets are influenced, more people can be hired, more commitments and services s & # They vote for the price. I translate: more likely there are traffics of influences and corruption. One way to limit these unfortunate phenomena is to divide power by a larger number of people and not allow the accumulation of power by a few. This is a makeover that would suit all parties. Which means that probably no one will defend it.
Source link
