[ad_1]
SIC will have to block public access to the content of episodes 1 and 2 of the Supernanny program, or take the promos available on the internet, and put picture and voice filters in the accessible parts of these episodes . ] According to the decision of the court, available on the page of the district attorney's office (DMPD), the judge concludes, with respect to episodes 1 and 2, the existence of a " direct and illegal threat to the legal personality, and reserves for the privacy of the minors' privacy "in light of" the best interests of the child "
The decision also implies that SIC claims its property rights "with all entities so that access to the content of referred programs is immediately blocked by these entities"
The court still maintained the penalty for each day of delay in complying with this decision.
The decision, which is not yet final, also implies that SIC claims its property rights "with all the entities so that access to one of the contents of these programs is immediately blocked by these entities. "
In this way, the court judges the prosecutor's requests for episodes 1 and 2 of Supernanny, a television program" in a format "reality doc. ", which aimed to show the public how to impose discipline and rules on children, these being the main target of public attraction / posting"
However, the court rejected the MP's request for programs possible and future of the same format could only be presented in the manner that the Court would determine, given the "manifestly unfeasible" situation.
The program "SuperNanny", which was provisionally suspended, was involved in a controversy shortly after the first episode, broadcast by CIS on January 14
D decided to modify the interim decision on episode 3, revoke the ban on exposure or condition it to the establishment of filters, to conclude by "the absence of unlawful threat to the personality of the "On this last point, the Member will appeal the decision. 19659002] The "SuperNanny" program, temporarily suspended, came into conflict shortly after the first episode, broadcast by CIS on January 14.
Following the television broadcast of the program, a special action to protect the personality on behalf of the targeted children and youth, which led SIC to suspend the program on January 26th.
Last June, as part of the complaint filed after 292 complaints about the Supernanny, the Regulatory Entity for Social Communication (ERC) decided to recommend to the CLC to preserve the intimacy of children in future programs.
To
ERC
recommended to television that in the future, programs involving the representation of minors, obtaining parental consent or tutelary for the participation of minors in television programs, describe in detail and understandably the content of these programs and the physical risks, psychic and social associations, also providing information that this consent is, under the terms of the law, revocable at any time.
He also advised that SIC "ensures, in all circumstances, that children's mediation preserves the inviolable aspects of their privacy and does not focus on their problematic behaviors" . [19659016] (function (d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0];
if (d.getElementById (id)) returns;
js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id;
js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.12&appId=352742014914127";
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs);
} (document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
[ad_2]
Source link
