[ad_1]
A little-known scientific journal publishes a fake cancer study by journalists as part of an investigation into unscrupulous publications. "
Journalists from two German media outlets, the daily" Süddeutsche Zeitung "and the public radio" NDR ", have reported to the Journal of Integrative Oncology" the results of a clinical study "which indicated" l ". propolis extract to be more effective in the case of colorectal cancer than conventional chemotherapy. "
Propolis is a resinous substance obtained from trees and transformed by bees to build honeycomb cells.
" The study was false, data and authors, affiliated with a research institute fictitious, did not exist either, but the publication was accepted in less than ten days and published on April 24th. "
The journal's website was linked to a version of the study, which has since been withdrawn after publishers were informed.
He read that the researchers compared the 39, effectiveness of chemotherapy with propolis capsules.At the end of the false scientific article, a subject was also unrelated to the subject, in this case, the effect of massage on thromboembolic diseases.
German Minister of Scientific Research, Anja Karliczek, declared himself
"It is in the very interest of science," said the German news agency citing the DPA
For the Minister, everything must be done "so that credibility and trust in science are not affected … Such errors must be revealed because only then can we change what is wrong. "
The magazine in question is published by an Indian publisher, Omics. According to Le Monde, there are "dozens of unscrupulous publishers" who "have created hundreds of free magazines with a resonance name, with all the characteristics of true scholarly journals", and are present in various scientific disciplines
Without any control over the quality of the works presented, the authors are invited to "publish hundreds of euros" per article, according to "Le Monde" and NDR.
In the most prestigious journals, where the edition requires an appreciation of the text by known scientists in the field in question, the so-called peer review, and where the validation process usually takes several months, the authors do not pay
[ad_2]
Source link
